Effect of near‐ridge thermal anomalies on the subsidence of the oceanic lithosphere: Constraints from a 2‐D dynamic model
Ling‐Yun Chiao, Chi‐Wei Wang
Abstract
Open-access reader
Ling‐Yun Chiao, Chi‐Wei Wang
Abstract
Open-access reader
A 2‐D dynamic cooling model with temperature‐dependent asthenosphere viscosity is devised to examine the impact of near‐ridge thermal anomalies on the subsidence of the oceanic lithosphere. In this model, mid‐ocean ridge segments with cooler than ambient mantle temperatures have calculated subsidence rates that cannot be differentiated from normal ridge segments. This occurs because the cooler thermal anomaly cannot be sustained, nor can it spread off‐axis, due to thermally driven near‐ridge buoyant flow. When the cooler anomaly is deeply rooted, this buoyant flow can be inhibited only when the asthenosphere viscosity is as high as 3×1020 Pa‐s. On the other hand, ridge segments with warmer mantle temperatures have significantly higher subsidence rates than those predicted from standard conductive cooling models. Simply varying the injection temperature invalidates the 1‐D simplification usually invoked implicitly in models of the cooling process of the oceanic lithosphere.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A 2‐D dynamic cooling model with temperature‐dependent asthenosphere viscosity is devised to examine the impact of near‐ridge thermal anomalies on the subsidence of the oceanic lithosphere. In this model, mid‐ocean ridge segments with cooler than ambient mantle temperatures have calculated subsidence rates that cannot be differentiated from normal ridge segments. This occurs because the cooler thermal anomaly cannot be sustained, nor can it spread off‐axis, due to thermally driven near‐ridge buoyant flow. When the cooler anomaly is deeply rooted, this buoyant flow can be inhibited only when the asthenosphere viscosity is as high as 3×1020 Pa‐s. On the other hand, ridge segments with warmer mantle temperatures have significantly higher subsidence rates than those predicted from standard conductive cooling models. Simply varying the injection temperature invalidates the 1‐D simplification usually invoked implicitly in models of the cooling process of the oceanic lithosphere.
Key concepts: Asthenosphere, Lithosphere, Geology, Mantle (geology), Ridge, Subsidence, Ridge push, Thermal subsidence