2011ElectrophoresisOpen access

Is metabolomics reachable? Different purification strategies of human colon cancer cells provide different CE‐MS metabolite profiles

Carolina Simó, Clara Ibáñez, Ángeles Gómez‐Martínez, José A. Ferragut, Alejandro Cifuentes

Open full text 50 citations

Abstract

In this work, four different metabolite purification approaches are investigated prior to metabolomics of human HT29 colon cancer cells. Namely, methanol deproteinization, ultrafiltration and two SPE methods using C18 and polymer-based cartridges were studied. The extracts were characterized via a metabolomic approach based on the application of CE TOF MS (CE-MS). CE-MS analysis time was less than 20 min per sample and allowed the simultaneous and reproducible analysis of more than 80 metabolites in a single run with a minimum consumption of sample and reagents. Metabolome analysis revealed in some cases important differences among the studied metabolite purification procedures. No significant differences were observed in the metabolite profile using C18 and polymer-based cartridges, or between ultrafiltration and methanol deproteinization. However, important differences were observed in the metabolomic profiles obtained from SPE and methanol deproteinization samples. These results demonstrate the crucial role of the metabolite purification strategy in metabolomics since it can bias (and in some cases mislead) the conclusions achieved by the metabolomic study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this work, four different metabolite purification approaches are investigated prior to metabolomics of human HT29 colon cancer cells. Namely, methanol deproteinization, ultrafiltration and two SPE methods using C18 and polymer-based cartridges were studied. The extracts were characterized via a metabolomic approach based on the application of CE TOF MS (CE-MS). CE-MS analysis time was less than 20 min per sample and allowed the simultaneous and reproducible analysis of more than 80 metabolites in a single run with a minimum consumption of sample and reagents. Metabolome analysis revealed in some cases important differences among the studied metabolite purification procedures. No significant differences were observed in the metabolite profile using C18 and polymer-based cartridges, or between ultrafiltration and methanol deproteinization. However, important differences were observed in the metabolomic profiles obtained from SPE and methanol deproteinization samples. These results demonstrate the crucial role of the metabolite purification strategy in metabolomics since it can bias (and in some cases mislead) the conclusions achieved by the metabolomic study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this work, four different metabolite purification approaches are investigated prior to metabolomics of human HT29 colon cancer cells. Namely, methanol deproteinization, ultrafiltration and two SPE methods using C18 and polymer-based cartridges were studied. The extracts were characterized via a metabolomic approach based on the application of CE TOF MS (CE-MS). CE-MS analysis time was less than 20 min per sample and allowed the simultaneous and reproducible analysis of more than 80 metabolites in a single run with a minimum consumption of sample and reagents. Metabolome analysis revealed in some cases important differences among the studied metabolite purification procedures. No significant differences were observed in the metabolite profile using C18 and polymer-based cartridges, or between ultrafiltration and methanol deproteinization. However, important differences were observed in the metabolomic profiles obtained from SPE and methanol deproteinization samples. These results demonstrate the crucial role of the metabolite purification strategy in metabolomics since it can bias (and in some cases mislead) the conclusions achieved by the metabolomic study.

Key concepts: Metabolomics, Metabolite, Metabolome, Chromatography, Ultrafiltration (renal), Chemistry, Methanol, Sample preparation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is metabolomics reachable? Different purification strategies of human colon cancer cells provide different CE‐MS metabolite profiles — Research Paper | ScholarLens