2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

Defining Benefits from Pavement Rehabilitation and Preservation

Tyler A. Dawson, G Y Baladi, Christopher M. Dean, Syed Waqar Haider, Karim Chatti

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Pavement service life can be defined as the estimated number of years between pavement construction or rehabilitation and when the pavement section reaches a given condition (rutting, cracking, roughness, etc.) threshold value. At that time, the pavement section is typically subjected to rehabilitation or preservation actions. The two overarching methodologies for determination of pavement fix benefits are: 1) the extension in the pavement service life due to a given fix and 2) the calculation of the area between the pavement performance curves and a given threshold value. The life extension method places importance in prolonging the service life of the pavement. On the other hand, the area under the performance curve method places importance on the level of pavement distress over time. Selection of the pavement fix type and time with the lowest cost to benefit ratio could be considered "optimal".

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Pavement service life can be defined as the estimated number of years between pavement construction or rehabilitation and when the pavement section reaches a given condition (rutting, cracking, roughness, etc.) threshold value. At that time, the pavement section is typically subjected to rehabilitation or preservation actions. The two overarching methodologies for determination of pavement fix benefits are: 1) the extension in the pavement service life due to a given fix and 2) the calculation of the area between the pavement performance curves and a given threshold value. The life extension method places importance in prolonging the service life of the pavement. On the other hand, the area under the performance curve method places importance on the level of pavement distress over time. Selection of the pavement fix type and time with the lowest cost to benefit ratio could be considered "optimal".

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Pavement service life can be defined as the estimated number of years between pavement construction or rehabilitation and when the pavement section reaches a given condition (rutting, cracking, roughness, etc.) threshold value. At that time, the pavement section is typically subjected to rehabilitation or preservation actions. The two overarching methodologies for determination of pavement fix benefits are: 1) the extension in the pavement service life due to a given fix and 2) the calculation of the area between the pavement performance curves and a given threshold value. The life extension method places importance in prolonging the service life of the pavement. On the other hand, the area under the performance curve method places importance on the level of pavement distress over time. Selection of the pavement fix type and time with the lowest cost to benefit ratio could be considered "optimal".

Key concepts: Rut, Service life, Pavement engineering, Service (business), Cracking, Rehabilitation, Driver rehabilitation, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Defining Benefits from Pavement Rehabilitation and Preservation — Research Paper | ScholarLens