2012•2012 Dallas, Texas, July 29 - August 1, 2012Requires access

Meta-Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Swine Manure Land Application

Zifei Liu, Wendy J. Powers

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Swine operations are important sources of greenhouse gases, primarily methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). The objective of the study was to provide a systematic review of the literature on GHG emissions from land following swine manure application through a meta-analysis that integrates results of individual previous studies. Results showed that, for CH4 emissions, land applied swine manure generate more emissions than land with no N added or land applied commercial N fertilizer. For N2O emissions, there was no significant difference between land applied with swine manure and that applied with commercial fertilizer of the same N amount. The CH4 and N2O emissions from swine manure land applications were commonly of the similar scale. Generally N2O emissions deserve more attention than CH4 emissions in swine manure land application, considering that the global warming potential of N2O is about 12 times higher than that of CH4 while CH4 and N2O emissions from swine manure land applications were commonly of the similar scale. The wide variations in reported N2O emission factors (0.7 to 2.2%, 95% CI in North American studies) indicate great potential in mitigating N2O emissions through optimized management practices. The N2O emissions from land applications can be affected by many factors, while factors affecting CH4 emissions were less studied. Results of meta-analysis indicated that CH4 emissions had an increasing trend with increasing annual average temperature and a deceasing trend with increasing annual precipitation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Swine operations are important sources of greenhouse gases, primarily methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). The objective of the study was to provide a systematic review of the literature on GHG emissions from land following swine manure application through a meta-analysis that integrates results of individual previous studies. Results showed that, for CH4 emissions, land applied swine manure generate more emissions than land with no N added or land applied commercial N fertilizer. For N2O emissions, there was no significant difference between land applied with swine manure and that applied with commercial fertilizer of the same N amount. The CH4 and N2O emissions from swine manure land applications were commonly of the similar scale. Generally N2O emissions deserve more attention than CH4 emissions in swine manure land application, considering that the global warming potential of N2O is about 12 times higher than that of CH4 while CH4 and N2O emissions from swine manure land applications were commonly of the similar scale. The wide variations in reported N2O emission factors (0.7 to 2.2%, 95% CI in North American studies) indicate great potential in mitigating N2O emissions through optimized management practices. The N2O emissions from land applications can be affected by many factors, while factors affecting CH4 emissions were less studied. Results of meta-analysis indicated that CH4 emissions had an increasing trend with increasing annual average temperature and a deceasing trend with increasing annual precipitation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Swine operations are important sources of greenhouse gases, primarily methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). The objective of the study was to provide a systematic review of the literature on GHG emissions from land following swine manure application through a meta-analysis that integrates results of individual previous studies. Results showed that, for CH4 emissions, land applied swine manure generate more emissions than land with no N added or land applied commercial N fertilizer. For N2O emissions, there was no significant difference between land applied with swine manure and that applied with commercial fertilizer of the same N amount. The CH4 and N2O emissions from swine manure land applications were commonly of the similar scale. Generally N2O emissions deserve more attention than CH4 emissions in swine manure land application, considering that the global warming potential of N2O is about 12 times higher than that of CH4 while CH4 and N2O emissions from swine manure land applications were commonly of the similar scale. The wide variations in reported N2O emission factors (0.7 to 2.2%, 95% CI in North American studies) indicate great potential in mitigating N2O emissions through optimized management practices. The N2O emissions from land applications can be affected by many factors, while factors affecting CH4 emissions were less studied. Results of meta-analysis indicated that CH4 emissions had an increasing trend with increasing annual average temperature and a deceasing trend with increasing annual precipitation.

Key concepts: Greenhouse gas, Environmental science, Manure, Manure management, Nitrous oxide, Methane emissions, Methane, Fertilizer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Meta-Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Swine Manure Land Application — Research Paper | ScholarLens