1990•Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyRequires access

Intimacy and liking: Mutual influence and the role of unique relationships.

Lynn Carol Miller

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

Traditional assumptions (e.g., there are traitlike differences in disclosure) predict that people who are generally liked should generally disclose (e.g., individual-level effects). In contrast, dynamic interactional models predict that significant disclosure-liking effects are apt to be a function of mutual influences in particular dyads (e.g., dyadic-level effects). To directly explore these issues and separately examine individual and dyadic effects, 45 sorority women were asked to indicate how much they disclosed to, received disclosure from, and liked each other. Social relations analysis (Kenny & LaVoie, 1984) revealed significant disclosure-liking effects only at the dyadic level, casting doubts on traditional assumptions and supporting a dynamic interaction model of disclosure-liking effects. Implications for personality and interpersonal relationships are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Traditional assumptions (e.g., there are traitlike differences in disclosure) predict that people who are generally liked should generally disclose (e.g., individual-level effects). In contrast, dynamic interactional models predict that significant disclosure-liking effects are apt to be a function of mutual influences in particular dyads (e.g., dyadic-level effects). To directly explore these issues and separately examine individual and dyadic effects, 45 sorority women were asked to indicate how much they disclosed to, received disclosure from, and liked each other. Social relations analysis (Kenny & LaVoie, 1984) revealed significant disclosure-liking effects only at the dyadic level, casting doubts on traditional assumptions and supporting a dynamic interaction model of disclosure-liking effects. Implications for personality and interpersonal relationships are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Traditional assumptions (e.g., there are traitlike differences in disclosure) predict that people who are generally liked should generally disclose (e.g., individual-level effects). In contrast, dynamic interactional models predict that significant disclosure-liking effects are apt to be a function of mutual influences in particular dyads (e.g., dyadic-level effects). To directly explore these issues and separately examine individual and dyadic effects, 45 sorority women were asked to indicate how much they disclosed to, received disclosure from, and liked each other. Social relations analysis (Kenny & LaVoie, 1984) revealed significant disclosure-liking effects only at the dyadic level, casting doubts on traditional assumptions and supporting a dynamic interaction model of disclosure-liking effects. Implications for personality and interpersonal relationships are discussed.

Key concepts: Psychology, Social psychology, Self-disclosure, Interpersonal communication, Personality, Interpersonal interaction, Interpersonal relationship, Social relation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intimacy and liking: Mutual influence and the role of unique relationships. — Research Paper | ScholarLens