1971EcologyRequires access

The Developmental Response of Predators to Changes in Prey Density

William W. Murdoch

Open publisher page 81 citations

Abstract

If a predator eats more prey at higher prey densities, grows more as a consequence, and then kills more prey because of its larger size, this produces a developmental response to prey density. In its functional response a predator sea shore snail caused a decreasing percentage mortality as prey (barnacle) density increased (type 2 response). This causes instability in prey numbers. However, when account was taken of the developmental response in a hypothetical pseudosnail, the prey mortality caused over a year by a single—predator as a function of prey density, was different from that expected on the basis of the functional response alone. There is a tendency for the mortality to be a fairly constant percentage of prey density over a rather large range of prey densities. This results in the reduction of the destabilizing effect. Problems of integrating these responses with the numerical response and of generalizing the results are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

If a predator eats more prey at higher prey densities, grows more as a consequence, and then kills more prey because of its larger size, this produces a developmental response to prey density. In its functional response a predator sea shore snail caused a decreasing percentage mortality as prey (barnacle) density increased (type 2 response). This causes instability in prey numbers. However, when account was taken of the developmental response in a hypothetical pseudosnail, the prey mortality caused over a year by a single—predator as a function of prey density, was different from that expected on the basis of the functional response alone. There is a tendency for the mortality to be a fairly constant percentage of prey density over a rather large range of prey densities. This results in the reduction of the destabilizing effect. Problems of integrating these responses with the numerical response and of generalizing the results are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 81 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

If a predator eats more prey at higher prey densities, grows more as a consequence, and then kills more prey because of its larger size, this produces a developmental response to prey density. In its functional response a predator sea shore snail caused a decreasing percentage mortality as prey (barnacle) density increased (type 2 response). This causes instability in prey numbers. However, when account was taken of the developmental response in a hypothetical pseudosnail, the prey mortality caused over a year by a single—predator as a function of prey density, was different from that expected on the basis of the functional response alone. There is a tendency for the mortality to be a fairly constant percentage of prey density over a rather large range of prey densities. This results in the reduction of the destabilizing effect. Problems of integrating these responses with the numerical response and of generalizing the results are discussed.

Key concepts: Predation, Functional response, Numerical response, Biology, Predator, Ecology, Range (aeronautics), Barnacle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Developmental Response of Predators to Changes in Prey Density — Research Paper | ScholarLens