The Developmental Response of Predators to Changes in Prey Density
William W. Murdoch
Abstract
William W. Murdoch
Abstract
If a predator eats more prey at higher prey densities, grows more as a consequence, and then kills more prey because of its larger size, this produces a developmental response to prey density. In its functional response a predator sea shore snail caused a decreasing percentage mortality as prey (barnacle) density increased (type 2 response). This causes instability in prey numbers. However, when account was taken of the developmental response in a hypothetical pseudosnail, the prey mortality caused over a year by a single—predator as a function of prey density, was different from that expected on the basis of the functional response alone. There is a tendency for the mortality to be a fairly constant percentage of prey density over a rather large range of prey densities. This results in the reduction of the destabilizing effect. Problems of integrating these responses with the numerical response and of generalizing the results are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 81 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
If a predator eats more prey at higher prey densities, grows more as a consequence, and then kills more prey because of its larger size, this produces a developmental response to prey density. In its functional response a predator sea shore snail caused a decreasing percentage mortality as prey (barnacle) density increased (type 2 response). This causes instability in prey numbers. However, when account was taken of the developmental response in a hypothetical pseudosnail, the prey mortality caused over a year by a single—predator as a function of prey density, was different from that expected on the basis of the functional response alone. There is a tendency for the mortality to be a fairly constant percentage of prey density over a rather large range of prey densities. This results in the reduction of the destabilizing effect. Problems of integrating these responses with the numerical response and of generalizing the results are discussed.
Key concepts: Predation, Functional response, Numerical response, Biology, Predator, Ecology, Range (aeronautics), Barnacle