The Role of Microhabitat in Structuring Desert Rodent Communities
Mary V. Price
Abstract
Open-access reader
Mary V. Price
Abstract
Open-access reader
Interspecific competition is thought to be important in determining patterns of resource use and species abundances in natural communities. However, there have been few field tests of competition—based models of community structure. In this study, experiments were conducted with 4 coexisting desert rodent species to see whether competition is a sufficient explanation for their resource use and abundance patterns. Results were consistent with 3 predictions from competition theory. (1) The 4 species differed in their use of a resource, foraging microhabitat, which is potentially limiting to their populations. (2) Each species shifted its use of microhabitats in predicted directions when competitors were removed from or added to outdoor enclosures. (3) Each species was most dense where its preferred microhabitat was abundant, and augmentation of 1 microhabitat led to an increase in the density of the appropriate microhabitat specialist. These results suggest that competition maintains interspecific differences in foraging microhabitat, and that the availability of appropriate microhabitats determines species abundances on a local scale.
OpenAlex reports 290 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Interspecific competition is thought to be important in determining patterns of resource use and species abundances in natural communities. However, there have been few field tests of competition—based models of community structure. In this study, experiments were conducted with 4 coexisting desert rodent species to see whether competition is a sufficient explanation for their resource use and abundance patterns. Results were consistent with 3 predictions from competition theory. (1) The 4 species differed in their use of a resource, foraging microhabitat, which is potentially limiting to their populations. (2) Each species shifted its use of microhabitats in predicted directions when competitors were removed from or added to outdoor enclosures. (3) Each species was most dense where its preferred microhabitat was abundant, and augmentation of 1 microhabitat led to an increase in the density of the appropriate microhabitat specialist. These results suggest that competition maintains interspecific differences in foraging microhabitat, and that the availability of appropriate microhabitats determines species abundances on a local scale.
Key concepts: Interspecific competition, Competition (biology), Foraging, Abundance (ecology), Ecology, Biology, Rodent, Coexistence theory