2009•Journal of Vascular and Interventional RadiologyOpen access

Uterine Artery Embolization versus Laparoscopic Occlusion of Uterine Arteries for Leiomyomas: Long-term Results of a Randomized Comparative Trial

Kirsten Hald, Hans Jørgen Noreng, Olav Istre, Nils‐Einar Kløw

Open full text 48 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laparoscopy, Uterine leiomyoma, Uterine artery embolization, Uterine artery, Surgery, Hysterectomy, Magnetic resonance imaging

Back to paper search Browse research topics Original source

Uterine Artery Embolization versus Laparoscopic Occlusion of Uterine Arteries for Leiomyomas: Long-term Results of a Randomized Comparative Trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens