2013•Journal of the history of philosophyOpen access

Nietzsche, Spinoza, and the Moral Affects

David Wollenberg

Open full text 23 citations

Abstract

Nietzsche expressed surprising admiration for the thought of Benedict Spinoza, referring to him enthusiastically as his “precursor.” Several scholars have tried to account for this affinity through global comparisons of the two thinkers’ doctrines, ignoring that Nietzsche’s knowledge of Spinoza was entirely mediated through his reading of secondary literature (in particular, that of Kuno Fischer). This article examines the Nietzsche-Spinoza relationship by investigating Nietzsche’s notes after his multiple readings of Fischer, as well as those parts of Fischer that Nietzsche read most carefully, and demonstrates that the latter’s text proved surprisingly influential in Nietzsche’s account of the origins of morality as presented in Genealogy of Morals . Spinoza (via Fischer) proves to be a vital inspiration for Nietzsche’s account of the origins of slave morality and the good/bad, good/evil distinction.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Nietzsche expressed surprising admiration for the thought of Benedict Spinoza, referring to him enthusiastically as his “precursor.” Several scholars have tried to account for this affinity through global comparisons of the two thinkers’ doctrines, ignoring that Nietzsche’s knowledge of Spinoza was entirely mediated through his reading of secondary literature (in particular, that of Kuno Fischer). This article examines the Nietzsche-Spinoza relationship by investigating Nietzsche’s notes after his multiple readings of Fischer, as well as those parts of Fischer that Nietzsche read most carefully, and demonstrates that the latter’s text proved surprisingly influential in Nietzsche’s account of the origins of morality as presented in Genealogy of Morals . Spinoza (via Fischer) proves to be a vital inspiration for Nietzsche’s account of the origins of slave morality and the good/bad, good/evil distinction.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Nietzsche expressed surprising admiration for the thought of Benedict Spinoza, referring to him enthusiastically as his “precursor.” Several scholars have tried to account for this affinity through global comparisons of the two thinkers’ doctrines, ignoring that Nietzsche’s knowledge of Spinoza was entirely mediated through his reading of secondary literature (in particular, that of Kuno Fischer). This article examines the Nietzsche-Spinoza relationship by investigating Nietzsche’s notes after his multiple readings of Fischer, as well as those parts of Fischer that Nietzsche read most carefully, and demonstrates that the latter’s text proved surprisingly influential in Nietzsche’s account of the origins of morality as presented in Genealogy of Morals . Spinoza (via Fischer) proves to be a vital inspiration for Nietzsche’s account of the origins of slave morality and the good/bad, good/evil distinction.

Key concepts: Philosophy, Environmental ethics, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nietzsche, Spinoza, and the Moral Affects — Research Paper | ScholarLens