2006•Geophysical Research LettersRequires access

An examination of advection in the northeast Pacific Ocean, 2001–2005

Jennifer M. Jackson, Paul G. Myers, Debby Ianson

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Horizontal advection has been assumed negligible within the Alaskan Gyre (AG). With the recently available Argo data this assumption can be tested. To estimate advection, the observed heat content (estimated from Argo data) was compared to the expected (based on surface heat fluxes) and the difference between these was defined as advection. Four stations were investigated. Our proxy suggests periods of greater advection than previously estimated. Most periods of strong advection were associated with oceanographic events such as the migration of the North Pacific Current and the passage of eddies. However, there were also periods of significant advection that were not expected, for example a region‐wide event was observed in the winter of 2004–05. These results show that although advection is minimal in the AG, there are periods in which use of 1‐D models for studies of short (monthly) scale processes is questionable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Horizontal advection has been assumed negligible within the Alaskan Gyre (AG). With the recently available Argo data this assumption can be tested. To estimate advection, the observed heat content (estimated from Argo data) was compared to the expected (based on surface heat fluxes) and the difference between these was defined as advection. Four stations were investigated. Our proxy suggests periods of greater advection than previously estimated. Most periods of strong advection were associated with oceanographic events such as the migration of the North Pacific Current and the passage of eddies. However, there were also periods of significant advection that were not expected, for example a region‐wide event was observed in the winter of 2004–05. These results show that although advection is minimal in the AG, there are periods in which use of 1‐D models for studies of short (monthly) scale processes is questionable.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Horizontal advection has been assumed negligible within the Alaskan Gyre (AG). With the recently available Argo data this assumption can be tested. To estimate advection, the observed heat content (estimated from Argo data) was compared to the expected (based on surface heat fluxes) and the difference between these was defined as advection. Four stations were investigated. Our proxy suggests periods of greater advection than previously estimated. Most periods of strong advection were associated with oceanographic events such as the migration of the North Pacific Current and the passage of eddies. However, there were also periods of significant advection that were not expected, for example a region‐wide event was observed in the winter of 2004–05. These results show that although advection is minimal in the AG, there are periods in which use of 1‐D models for studies of short (monthly) scale processes is questionable.

Key concepts: Advection, Argo, Climatology, Ocean gyre, Environmental science, Geology, Eddy, Oceanography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An examination of advection in the northeast Pacific Ocean, 2001–2005 — Research Paper | ScholarLens