Unexpected Tigecycline Resistance AmongAcinetobacter baumanniiIsolates: High Minor Error Rate by Etest
Canan Külah, Güven Çelebi, Elif Aktaş, Zafer Mengeloğlu, Füsun Cömert, Handan Ankaralı
Abstract
Canan Külah, Güven Çelebi, Elif Aktaş, Zafer Mengeloğlu, Füsun Cömert, Handan Ankaralı
Abstract
Tigecycline seems to be a promising agent for treatment of resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, however approved criteria for susceptibility testing are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate tigecycline activity against multidrug resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates, as well as susceptibility testing methods and disk diffusion (DD) breakpoints. Reference broth microdilution (BMD), etest and DD methods were used. MIC50 and MIC90 by the reference method were 1 and 8? μg/ml, respectively. Applying the breakpoints for Enterobactericeae, 85.7% of the isolates were sensitive to tigecycline. The Etest resulted in lower susceptibility rates (63.7%). Essential agreement between Etest and BMD was 75.8%. 21.9% of the strains were susceptible by BMD and intermediate by Etest. Provisional DD breakpoints ≥19/≤14 mm produced unacceptable minor errors while adjustment to ≥17/≤13 mm yielded the best results. In conclusion, resistance was not rare against our MDR A. baumanniiisolates although tigecycline had not been used previously. Breakpoints ≥17/≤13 mm may be preferred for DD. We suggest caution with intermediate results by Etest.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Tigecycline seems to be a promising agent for treatment of resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, however approved criteria for susceptibility testing are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate tigecycline activity against multidrug resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates, as well as susceptibility testing methods and disk diffusion (DD) breakpoints. Reference broth microdilution (BMD), etest and DD methods were used. MIC50 and MIC90 by the reference method were 1 and 8? μg/ml, respectively. Applying the breakpoints for Enterobactericeae, 85.7% of the isolates were sensitive to tigecycline. The Etest resulted in lower susceptibility rates (63.7%). Essential agreement between Etest and BMD was 75.8%. 21.9% of the strains were susceptible by BMD and intermediate by Etest. Provisional DD breakpoints ≥19/≤14 mm produced unacceptable minor errors while adjustment to ≥17/≤13 mm yielded the best results. In conclusion, resistance was not rare against our MDR A. baumanniiisolates although tigecycline had not been used previously. Breakpoints ≥17/≤13 mm may be preferred for DD. We suggest caution with intermediate results by Etest.
Key concepts: Etest, Tigecycline, Broth microdilution, Acinetobacter baumannii, Microbiology, Medicine, Minimum inhibitory concentration, Biology