2009Journal of ChemotherapyRequires access

Unexpected Tigecycline Resistance AmongAcinetobacter baumanniiIsolates: High Minor Error Rate by Etest

Canan Külah, Güven Çelebi, Elif Aktaş, Zafer Mengeloğlu, Füsun Cömert, Handan Ankaralı

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Tigecycline seems to be a promising agent for treatment of resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, however approved criteria for susceptibility testing are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate tigecycline activity against multidrug resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates, as well as susceptibility testing methods and disk diffusion (DD) breakpoints. Reference broth microdilution (BMD), etest and DD methods were used. MIC50 and MIC90 by the reference method were 1 and 8? μg/ml, respectively. Applying the breakpoints for Enterobactericeae, 85.7% of the isolates were sensitive to tigecycline. The Etest resulted in lower susceptibility rates (63.7%). Essential agreement between Etest and BMD was 75.8%. 21.9% of the strains were susceptible by BMD and intermediate by Etest. Provisional DD breakpoints ≥19/≤14 mm produced unacceptable minor errors while adjustment to ≥17/≤13 mm yielded the best results. In conclusion, resistance was not rare against our MDR A. baumanniiisolates although tigecycline had not been used previously. Breakpoints ≥17/≤13 mm may be preferred for DD. We suggest caution with intermediate results by Etest.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Tigecycline seems to be a promising agent for treatment of resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, however approved criteria for susceptibility testing are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate tigecycline activity against multidrug resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates, as well as susceptibility testing methods and disk diffusion (DD) breakpoints. Reference broth microdilution (BMD), etest and DD methods were used. MIC50 and MIC90 by the reference method were 1 and 8? μg/ml, respectively. Applying the breakpoints for Enterobactericeae, 85.7% of the isolates were sensitive to tigecycline. The Etest resulted in lower susceptibility rates (63.7%). Essential agreement between Etest and BMD was 75.8%. 21.9% of the strains were susceptible by BMD and intermediate by Etest. Provisional DD breakpoints ≥19/≤14 mm produced unacceptable minor errors while adjustment to ≥17/≤13 mm yielded the best results. In conclusion, resistance was not rare against our MDR A. baumanniiisolates although tigecycline had not been used previously. Breakpoints ≥17/≤13 mm may be preferred for DD. We suggest caution with intermediate results by Etest.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Tigecycline seems to be a promising agent for treatment of resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, however approved criteria for susceptibility testing are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate tigecycline activity against multidrug resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates, as well as susceptibility testing methods and disk diffusion (DD) breakpoints. Reference broth microdilution (BMD), etest and DD methods were used. MIC50 and MIC90 by the reference method were 1 and 8? μg/ml, respectively. Applying the breakpoints for Enterobactericeae, 85.7% of the isolates were sensitive to tigecycline. The Etest resulted in lower susceptibility rates (63.7%). Essential agreement between Etest and BMD was 75.8%. 21.9% of the strains were susceptible by BMD and intermediate by Etest. Provisional DD breakpoints ≥19/≤14 mm produced unacceptable minor errors while adjustment to ≥17/≤13 mm yielded the best results. In conclusion, resistance was not rare against our MDR A. baumanniiisolates although tigecycline had not been used previously. Breakpoints ≥17/≤13 mm may be preferred for DD. We suggest caution with intermediate results by Etest.

Key concepts: Etest, Tigecycline, Broth microdilution, Acinetobacter baumannii, Microbiology, Medicine, Minimum inhibitory concentration, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Unexpected Tigecycline Resistance AmongAcinetobacter baumanniiIsolates: High Minor Error Rate by Etest — Research Paper | ScholarLens