2013The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineOpen access

Role of diffusion weighted MRI in differentiating typical from atypical meningiomas at 1.5 and 3T MRI

Anup Kumar Gupta, Shailesh M Prabhu, Jyoti Sureka, Geeta Chacko

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Atypical and malignant meningiomas are considered to have a higher rate of recurrence and show aggressive behavior compared to benign variety. The purpose of our study was to study the role of diffusion weighted imaging and determination of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and ADC ratios to differentiate typical meningiomas from atypical/malignant variety at 1.5 and 3T MRI. A total of 94 adult patients (48 patients at 3T and 46 patients at 1.5T) with pathologically proven meningiomas were retrospectively evaluated on conventional and diffusion weighted MRI. The signal intensity of the lesions on DW imaging was evaluated. ADC values and ADC ratios were calculated from lesion and contralateral normal white matter. 94 lesions comprising of 66 benign and 28 atypical meningiomas were evaluated. The mean ADC values at 3T MRI were 0.82 ± 0.12 × 10−3 in benign (typical) meningiomas and 0.68 ± 0.10 × 10−3 in atypical meningiomas. At 1.5T, the mean ADC values of benign meningiomas were 0.83 ± 0.11 × 10−3 and 0.70 ± 0.09 × 10−3 in atypical meningiomas. The mean ADC ratios were 1.08 ± 0.17 and 0.85 ± 0.15 for benign and atypical meningiomas respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean ADC ratios and the mean ADC values of typical and atypical meningiomas (P < 0.001) at both 1.5T and 3T MRI. DWI with calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and ADC ratios has a potential role in differentiating benign from atypical meningiomas at both 1.5 and 3T MRI. The differences in mean ADC values between benign and atypical meningiomas were similar at both 1.5 and 3T MRI.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Atypical and malignant meningiomas are considered to have a higher rate of recurrence and show aggressive behavior compared to benign variety. The purpose of our study was to study the role of diffusion weighted imaging and determination of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and ADC ratios to differentiate typical meningiomas from atypical/malignant variety at 1.5 and 3T MRI. A total of 94 adult patients (48 patients at 3T and 46 patients at 1.5T) with pathologically proven meningiomas were retrospectively evaluated on conventional and diffusion weighted MRI. The signal intensity of the lesions on DW imaging was evaluated. ADC values and ADC ratios were calculated from lesion and contralateral normal white matter. 94 lesions comprising of 66 benign and 28 atypical meningiomas were evaluated. The mean ADC values at 3T MRI were 0.82 ± 0.12 × 10−3 in benign (typical) meningiomas and 0.68 ± 0.10 × 10−3 in atypical meningiomas. At 1.5T, the mean ADC values of benign meningiomas were 0.83 ± 0.11 × 10−3 and 0.70 ± 0.09 × 10−3 in atypical meningiomas. The mean ADC ratios were 1.08 ± 0.17 and 0.85 ± 0.15 for benign and atypical meningiomas respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean ADC ratios and the mean ADC values of typical and atypical meningiomas (P < 0.001) at both 1.5T and 3T MRI. DWI with calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and ADC ratios has a potential role in differentiating benign from atypical meningiomas at both 1.5 and 3T MRI. The differences in mean ADC values between benign and atypical meningiomas were similar at both 1.5 and 3T MRI.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Atypical and malignant meningiomas are considered to have a higher rate of recurrence and show aggressive behavior compared to benign variety. The purpose of our study was to study the role of diffusion weighted imaging and determination of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and ADC ratios to differentiate typical meningiomas from atypical/malignant variety at 1.5 and 3T MRI. A total of 94 adult patients (48 patients at 3T and 46 patients at 1.5T) with pathologically proven meningiomas were retrospectively evaluated on conventional and diffusion weighted MRI. The signal intensity of the lesions on DW imaging was evaluated. ADC values and ADC ratios were calculated from lesion and contralateral normal white matter. 94 lesions comprising of 66 benign and 28 atypical meningiomas were evaluated. The mean ADC values at 3T MRI were 0.82 ± 0.12 × 10−3 in benign (typical) meningiomas and 0.68 ± 0.10 × 10−3 in atypical meningiomas. At 1.5T, the mean ADC values of benign meningiomas were 0.83 ± 0.11 × 10−3 and 0.70 ± 0.09 × 10−3 in atypical meningiomas. The mean ADC ratios were 1.08 ± 0.17 and 0.85 ± 0.15 for benign and atypical meningiomas respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean ADC ratios and the mean ADC values of typical and atypical meningiomas (P < 0.001) at both 1.5T and 3T MRI. DWI with calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and ADC ratios has a potential role in differentiating benign from atypical meningiomas at both 1.5 and 3T MRI. The differences in mean ADC values between benign and atypical meningiomas were similar at both 1.5 and 3T MRI.

Key concepts: Medicine, Effective diffusion coefficient, Diffusion MRI, Nuclear medicine, Meningioma, Magnetic resonance imaging, White matter, Lesion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Role of diffusion weighted MRI in differentiating typical from atypical meningiomas at 1.5 and 3T MRI — Research Paper | ScholarLens