2003Psychiatry and Clinical NeurosciencesOpen access

Childhood Autism Rating Scale − Tokyo Version for screening pervasive developmental disorders

Hisateru Tachimori, Hirokazu Osada, Hiroshi Kurita

Open full text 86 citations

Abstract

To assess the utility of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale - Tokyo Version (CARS-TV), its total score was compared among 430 children with DSM-IV per subgroup (i.e. autistic disorder (AD), childhood disintegrative disorder (CDD), Asperger's disorder, and pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) not otherwise specified (PDDNOS)). Values of Cronbach's alpha were 0.91 for the PDD group and 0.89 for the non-PDD mental retardation (MR) group, and 0.93 for both groups combined. The total score was significantly higher in PDD (mean = 30.1, SD = 4.5) than in non-PDD MR (mean = 22.9, SD = 3.3), t(503) = 13.7, P< 0.0001. The cut-off to distinguish PDD from non-PDD MR was 25.5/26, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.86, 0.83, 0.97 and 0.50, respectively. The total score differed significantly among the four groups, with CDD and AD being significantly higher than both PDDNOS and Asperger's disorder, PDDNOS being significantly higher than Asperger's disorder and no significant difference between CDD and AD. The cut-off to distinguish AD from PDDNOS was 30/30.5, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.71, 0.75, 0.77 and 0.69, respectively. CARS-TV seems to be a useful instrument for differentiating between PDD and non-PDD MR and between AD and PDDNOS, although further replication is needed.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To assess the utility of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale - Tokyo Version (CARS-TV), its total score was compared among 430 children with DSM-IV per subgroup (i.e. autistic disorder (AD), childhood disintegrative disorder (CDD), Asperger's disorder, and pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) not otherwise specified (PDDNOS)). Values of Cronbach's alpha were 0.91 for the PDD group and 0.89 for the non-PDD mental retardation (MR) group, and 0.93 for both groups combined. The total score was significantly higher in PDD (mean = 30.1, SD = 4.5) than in non-PDD MR (mean = 22.9, SD = 3.3), t(503) = 13.7, P< 0.0001. The cut-off to distinguish PDD from non-PDD MR was 25.5/26, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.86, 0.83, 0.97 and 0.50, respectively. The total score differed significantly among the four groups, with CDD and AD being significantly higher than both PDDNOS and Asperger's disorder, PDDNOS being significantly higher than Asperger's disorder and no significant difference between CDD and AD. The cut-off to distinguish AD from PDDNOS was 30/30.5, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.71, 0.75, 0.77 and 0.69, respectively. CARS-TV seems to be a useful instrument for differentiating between PDD and non-PDD MR and between AD and PDDNOS, although further replication is needed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 86 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To assess the utility of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale - Tokyo Version (CARS-TV), its total score was compared among 430 children with DSM-IV per subgroup (i.e. autistic disorder (AD), childhood disintegrative disorder (CDD), Asperger's disorder, and pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) not otherwise specified (PDDNOS)). Values of Cronbach's alpha were 0.91 for the PDD group and 0.89 for the non-PDD mental retardation (MR) group, and 0.93 for both groups combined. The total score was significantly higher in PDD (mean = 30.1, SD = 4.5) than in non-PDD MR (mean = 22.9, SD = 3.3), t(503) = 13.7, P< 0.0001. The cut-off to distinguish PDD from non-PDD MR was 25.5/26, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.86, 0.83, 0.97 and 0.50, respectively. The total score differed significantly among the four groups, with CDD and AD being significantly higher than both PDDNOS and Asperger's disorder, PDDNOS being significantly higher than Asperger's disorder and no significant difference between CDD and AD. The cut-off to distinguish AD from PDDNOS was 30/30.5, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.71, 0.75, 0.77 and 0.69, respectively. CARS-TV seems to be a useful instrument for differentiating between PDD and non-PDD MR and between AD and PDDNOS, although further replication is needed.

Key concepts: Childhood Autism Rating Scale, Pervasive developmental disorder, Autism, Asperger syndrome, Predictive value, Psychology, Rating scale, Autism spectrum disorder

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Childhood Autism Rating Scale − Tokyo Version for screening pervasive developmental disorders — Research Paper | ScholarLens