Assessment of the Protective Effects of Amifostine against Cisplatin-Induced Toxicity
Abdulmohsen E. Hussain, Brian W. Blakley, Marta Nicolás, Janet Balderston
Abstract
Abdulmohsen E. Hussain, Brian W. Blakley, Marta Nicolás, Janet Balderston
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to determine whether the toxicity of cisplatin, a chemotherapeutic alkylating agent, could be reduced by the use of amifostine and to determine whether amifostine alone could cause ototoxicity. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, animal study. METHODS: Auditory brainstem response click threshold, latencies, and blood work were used to measure ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and myelotoxicity before and 4 weeks after treatment. Groups of guinea pigs received either cisplatin alone (30 mg/kg), amifostine (1000 mg/kg), cisplatin plus amifostine (1000 mg/kg), or no agent. RESULTS: Amifostine reduced the hearing loss caused by cisplatin for many animals. Amifostine partially protected against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and renal toxicity. We did not find evidence for myelotoxicity owing to cisplatin in this sample. CONCLUSION: Amifostine may have a role in reducing toxicity or permitting larger doses of cisplatin to be given, but toxicity can still be significant even with protection.
OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to determine whether the toxicity of cisplatin, a chemotherapeutic alkylating agent, could be reduced by the use of amifostine and to determine whether amifostine alone could cause ototoxicity. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, animal study. METHODS: Auditory brainstem response click threshold, latencies, and blood work were used to measure ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and myelotoxicity before and 4 weeks after treatment. Groups of guinea pigs received either cisplatin alone (30 mg/kg), amifostine (1000 mg/kg), cisplatin plus amifostine (1000 mg/kg), or no agent. RESULTS: Amifostine reduced the hearing loss caused by cisplatin for many animals. Amifostine partially protected against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and renal toxicity. We did not find evidence for myelotoxicity owing to cisplatin in this sample. CONCLUSION: Amifostine may have a role in reducing toxicity or permitting larger doses of cisplatin to be given, but toxicity can still be significant even with protection.
Key concepts: Amifostine, Ototoxicity, Cisplatin, Medicine, Toxicity, Nephrotoxicity, Pharmacology, Chemotherapy