2011Journal of Agriculture Forestry and the Social SciencesRequires access

Cost and returns analysis of cotton production in Katsina state, Nigeria

OB Adeniji, A.J. Jirgi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The study examined the cost and returns of cotton production and identified the constraints associated with its production in katsina State. A sample of 250 small-scale farmers waspurposively selected from Malumfashi, Funtua and Daudawa in katsina state. Data were obtained from farmers through interview schedules. The data collected were nalysed using descriptive statistics and budgeting techniques. The cost and returns analysis indicated that the cost of fertilizer and other inputs like chemicals and seed accounted for 18% of the total variable cost incurred in cotton production. it was found that cotton production was profitable as indicated by the average net income (N20526.30) The total cost of production was (N 45796) while the total revenue was (N 66216.66 ) and the average net return showed that small holder cotton enterprise is profitable . Despite the profit margin, farmers were confronted with the problem of high cost of inputs especially fertilizer, improved seed, adulterated chemicals. The paper recommended that farmers should form cooperatives in order to put resources together to purchase inputs particularly herbicides and pesticides.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The study examined the cost and returns of cotton production and identified the constraints associated with its production in katsina State. A sample of 250 small-scale farmers waspurposively selected from Malumfashi, Funtua and Daudawa in katsina state. Data were obtained from farmers through interview schedules. The data collected were nalysed using descriptive statistics and budgeting techniques. The cost and returns analysis indicated that the cost of fertilizer and other inputs like chemicals and seed accounted for 18% of the total variable cost incurred in cotton production. it was found that cotton production was profitable as indicated by the average net income (N20526.30) The total cost of production was (N 45796) while the total revenue was (N 66216.66 ) and the average net return showed that small holder cotton enterprise is profitable . Despite the profit margin, farmers were confronted with the problem of high cost of inputs especially fertilizer, improved seed, adulterated chemicals. The paper recommended that farmers should form cooperatives in order to put resources together to purchase inputs particularly herbicides and pesticides.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The study examined the cost and returns of cotton production and identified the constraints associated with its production in katsina State. A sample of 250 small-scale farmers waspurposively selected from Malumfashi, Funtua and Daudawa in katsina state. Data were obtained from farmers through interview schedules. The data collected were nalysed using descriptive statistics and budgeting techniques. The cost and returns analysis indicated that the cost of fertilizer and other inputs like chemicals and seed accounted for 18% of the total variable cost incurred in cotton production. it was found that cotton production was profitable as indicated by the average net income (N20526.30) The total cost of production was (N 45796) while the total revenue was (N 66216.66 ) and the average net return showed that small holder cotton enterprise is profitable . Despite the profit margin, farmers were confronted with the problem of high cost of inputs especially fertilizer, improved seed, adulterated chemicals. The paper recommended that farmers should form cooperatives in order to put resources together to purchase inputs particularly herbicides and pesticides.

Key concepts: Agricultural science, Production (economics), Net profit, Profit (economics), Revenue, Total revenue, Variable cost, Fertilizer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost and returns analysis of cotton production in Katsina state, Nigeria — Research Paper | ScholarLens