1994The Journal of Cell BiologyOpen access

Kinetoplast DNA replication: mechanistic differences between Trypanosoma brucei and Crithidia fasciculata.

Matthew Ferguson, Al F. Torri, David Pérez‐Morga, David C. Ward, Paul T. Englund

Open full text 54 citations

Abstract

Kinetoplast DNA, the mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomatid parasites, is a network containing several thousand minicircles and a few dozen maxicircles. We compared kinetoplast DNA replication in Trypanosoma brucei and Crithidia fasciculata using fluorescence in situ hybridization and electron microscopy of isolated networks. One difference is in the location of maxicircles in situ. In C. fasciculata, maxicircles are concentrated in discrete foci embedded in the kinetoplast disk; during replication the foci increase in number but remain scattered throughout the disk. In contrast, T. brucei maxicircles generally fill the entire disk. Unlike those in C. fasciculata, T. brucei maxicircles become highly concentrated in the central region of the kinetoplast after replication; then during segregation they redistribute throughout the daughter kinetoplasts. T. brucei and C. fasciculata also differ in the pattern of attachment of newly synthesized minicircles to the network. In C. fasciculata it was known that minicircles are attached at two antipodal sites but subsequently are found uniformly distributed around the network periphery, possibly due to a relative movement of the kinetoplast disk and two protein complexes responsible for minicircle synthesis and attachment. In T. brucei, minicircles appear to be attached at two antipodal sites but then remain concentrated in these two regions. Therefore, the relative movement of the kinetoplast and the two protein complexes may not occur in T. brucei.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Kinetoplast DNA, the mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomatid parasites, is a network containing several thousand minicircles and a few dozen maxicircles. We compared kinetoplast DNA replication in Trypanosoma brucei and Crithidia fasciculata using fluorescence in situ hybridization and electron microscopy of isolated networks. One difference is in the location of maxicircles in situ. In C. fasciculata, maxicircles are concentrated in discrete foci embedded in the kinetoplast disk; during replication the foci increase in number but remain scattered throughout the disk. In contrast, T. brucei maxicircles generally fill the entire disk. Unlike those in C. fasciculata, T. brucei maxicircles become highly concentrated in the central region of the kinetoplast after replication; then during segregation they redistribute throughout the daughter kinetoplasts. T. brucei and C. fasciculata also differ in the pattern of attachment of newly synthesized minicircles to the network. In C. fasciculata it was known that minicircles are attached at two antipodal sites but subsequently are found uniformly distributed around the network periphery, possibly due to a relative movement of the kinetoplast disk and two protein complexes responsible for minicircle synthesis and attachment. In T. brucei, minicircles appear to be attached at two antipodal sites but then remain concentrated in these two regions. Therefore, the relative movement of the kinetoplast and the two protein complexes may not occur in T. brucei.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 54 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Kinetoplast DNA, the mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomatid parasites, is a network containing several thousand minicircles and a few dozen maxicircles. We compared kinetoplast DNA replication in Trypanosoma brucei and Crithidia fasciculata using fluorescence in situ hybridization and electron microscopy of isolated networks. One difference is in the location of maxicircles in situ. In C. fasciculata, maxicircles are concentrated in discrete foci embedded in the kinetoplast disk; during replication the foci increase in number but remain scattered throughout the disk. In contrast, T. brucei maxicircles generally fill the entire disk. Unlike those in C. fasciculata, T. brucei maxicircles become highly concentrated in the central region of the kinetoplast after replication; then during segregation they redistribute throughout the daughter kinetoplasts. T. brucei and C. fasciculata also differ in the pattern of attachment of newly synthesized minicircles to the network. In C. fasciculata it was known that minicircles are attached at two antipodal sites but subsequently are found uniformly distributed around the network periphery, possibly due to a relative movement of the kinetoplast disk and two protein complexes responsible for minicircle synthesis and attachment. In T. brucei, minicircles appear to be attached at two antipodal sites but then remain concentrated in these two regions. Therefore, the relative movement of the kinetoplast and the two protein complexes may not occur in T. brucei.

Key concepts: Crithidia fasciculata, Kinetoplast, Minicircle, Trypanosoma brucei, Biology, Crithidia, DNA replication, Cell biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Kinetoplast DNA replication: mechanistic differences between Trypanosoma brucei and Crithidia fasciculata. — Research Paper | ScholarLens