Lymphovascular Invasion in Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma: A Study of 22 Cases
Elizabeth McQuitty, Jae Y. Ro, Luan D. Truong, Steven S. Shen, Qihui Zhai, Alberto G. Ayala
Abstract
Open-access reader
Elizabeth McQuitty, Jae Y. Ro, Luan D. Truong, Steven S. Shen, Qihui Zhai, Alberto G. Ayala
Abstract
Open-access reader
CONTEXT: Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MPUC) is a known aggressive variant of urothelial carcinoma. However, the reasons for its aggressiveness remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of lymphovascular invasion in 22 cases of MPUC. DESIGN: Consecutive tissue sections were stained with D2-40 and CD34 to highlight lymphovascular channels associated with MPUC. Spaces containing tumor cells were scored as positive for lymphovascular invasion if the staining pattern on immunohistochemistry was distinct and circumferential. RESULTS: Of 22 cases, 21 (95%) had lymphovascular invasion on immunohistochemical staining, with 91% lymphatic invasion and 4% vascular invasion. Interestingly, 8 cases were originally signed out as negative for lymphovascular invasion on the basis of hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections; of these, 7 (88%) had focal lymphovascular invasion evident on immunohistochemical staining. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that micropapillary lacunae are not lymphovascular channels. However, nearly all MPUC tumors (95% in this series) have evidence of lymphovascular invasion by immunohistochemical analysis. Our data support the use of micropapillary features as a morphologic marker for lymphovascular invasion and MPUC as an adverse histologic type of urothelial carcinoma.
OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
CONTEXT: Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MPUC) is a known aggressive variant of urothelial carcinoma. However, the reasons for its aggressiveness remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of lymphovascular invasion in 22 cases of MPUC. DESIGN: Consecutive tissue sections were stained with D2-40 and CD34 to highlight lymphovascular channels associated with MPUC. Spaces containing tumor cells were scored as positive for lymphovascular invasion if the staining pattern on immunohistochemistry was distinct and circumferential. RESULTS: Of 22 cases, 21 (95%) had lymphovascular invasion on immunohistochemical staining, with 91% lymphatic invasion and 4% vascular invasion. Interestingly, 8 cases were originally signed out as negative for lymphovascular invasion on the basis of hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections; of these, 7 (88%) had focal lymphovascular invasion evident on immunohistochemical staining. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that micropapillary lacunae are not lymphovascular channels. However, nearly all MPUC tumors (95% in this series) have evidence of lymphovascular invasion by immunohistochemical analysis. Our data support the use of micropapillary features as a morphologic marker for lymphovascular invasion and MPUC as an adverse histologic type of urothelial carcinoma.
Key concepts: Lymphovascular invasion, Pathology, Immunohistochemistry, H&E stain, Carcinoma, Tumor budding, Lymphatic system, Medicine