1971Greece and RomeRequires access

The Cyclops of Euripides

R. G. Ussher

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

It might have been expected that the Cyclops, as our only complete surviving satyr-play, would attract wide attention among scholars. In fact, it has largely been neglected: no edition (and very little else) has appeared for over forty years in English. The present paper aims merely to suggest that the time may be ripe for reappraisal.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It might have been expected that the Cyclops, as our only complete surviving satyr-play, would attract wide attention among scholars. In fact, it has largely been neglected: no edition (and very little else) has appeared for over forty years in English. The present paper aims merely to suggest that the time may be ripe for reappraisal.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It might have been expected that the Cyclops, as our only complete surviving satyr-play, would attract wide attention among scholars. In fact, it has largely been neglected: no edition (and very little else) has appeared for over forty years in English. The present paper aims merely to suggest that the time may be ripe for reappraisal.

Key concepts: Cyclops, History, Literature, Psychology, Art, Biology, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Cyclops of Euripides — Research Paper | ScholarLens