1985Investigative RadiologyRequires access

Intrathecal Toxicity of Iohexol vs. Metrizamide

Victor M. Haughton

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Arachnoiditis, a common finding in patients who have had previous myelograms or spinal surgery, can cause pain, paresis, and can slow elimination of contrast medium from the subarachnoid space. The role of contrast media in producing arachnoiditis has not been well defined but can be studied in a primate model. This study compared incidence of arachnoiditis in monkeys after myelograms using two nonionic contrast media, iohexol and metrizamide. Conditions were chosen to produce the greatest possible effect of contrast medium on the arachnoid. Animals were sacrificed 12 weeks after the myelogram and the dural sac was removed for examination by light microscope. Under adverse conditions, high doses and high concentrations of iohexol produced little arachnoiditis, while metrizamide produced mild to moderate arachnoiditis. Iohexol was shown to have a greater margin of safety then metrizamide, which is considered an important clinical advantage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Arachnoiditis, a common finding in patients who have had previous myelograms or spinal surgery, can cause pain, paresis, and can slow elimination of contrast medium from the subarachnoid space. The role of contrast media in producing arachnoiditis has not been well defined but can be studied in a primate model. This study compared incidence of arachnoiditis in monkeys after myelograms using two nonionic contrast media, iohexol and metrizamide. Conditions were chosen to produce the greatest possible effect of contrast medium on the arachnoid. Animals were sacrificed 12 weeks after the myelogram and the dural sac was removed for examination by light microscope. Under adverse conditions, high doses and high concentrations of iohexol produced little arachnoiditis, while metrizamide produced mild to moderate arachnoiditis. Iohexol was shown to have a greater margin of safety then metrizamide, which is considered an important clinical advantage.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Arachnoiditis, a common finding in patients who have had previous myelograms or spinal surgery, can cause pain, paresis, and can slow elimination of contrast medium from the subarachnoid space. The role of contrast media in producing arachnoiditis has not been well defined but can be studied in a primate model. This study compared incidence of arachnoiditis in monkeys after myelograms using two nonionic contrast media, iohexol and metrizamide. Conditions were chosen to produce the greatest possible effect of contrast medium on the arachnoid. Animals were sacrificed 12 weeks after the myelogram and the dural sac was removed for examination by light microscope. Under adverse conditions, high doses and high concentrations of iohexol produced little arachnoiditis, while metrizamide produced mild to moderate arachnoiditis. Iohexol was shown to have a greater margin of safety then metrizamide, which is considered an important clinical advantage.

Key concepts: Metrizamide, Iohexol, Arachnoiditis, Contrast medium, Medicine, Myelography, Subarachnoid space, Paresis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intrathecal Toxicity of Iohexol vs. Metrizamide — Research Paper | ScholarLens