2011IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical InsulationRequires access

Electrohydrodynamic secondary flow and particle collection efficiency in a one-sided spike-plate type electrostatic precipitator

J. Podliński, A. Niewulis, V. I. Shapoval, J. Mizeraczyk

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

In this work, results of electrohydrodynamic secondary flow and particle collection efficiency measurements in an electrostatic precipitator under positive and negative voltage polarity are presented. The electrostatic precipitator had two plate collecting electrodes and a single spike discharge electrode. The spike tips were only on one side of the discharge electrode, therefore called a one-sided spike electrode. The electrohydrodynamic secondary flow pattern and collection efficiency measurements were carried out for two one-sided spike electrode positions: with the spike tips directed either upstream or downstream the primary flow. The results of the flow pattern measurement showed different flow patterns for different spike tips positions in respect to the primary flow direction. The electrostatic precipitator collection efficiency measurements clearly showed difference in the particle collection for both spike tips positions. Since the other electrostatic precipitator working parameters were the same, it can be concluded that the observed change of the electrohydrodynamic secondary flow was the main reason of the difference in the electrostatic precipitator collection efficiency.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this work, results of electrohydrodynamic secondary flow and particle collection efficiency measurements in an electrostatic precipitator under positive and negative voltage polarity are presented. The electrostatic precipitator had two plate collecting electrodes and a single spike discharge electrode. The spike tips were only on one side of the discharge electrode, therefore called a one-sided spike electrode. The electrohydrodynamic secondary flow pattern and collection efficiency measurements were carried out for two one-sided spike electrode positions: with the spike tips directed either upstream or downstream the primary flow. The results of the flow pattern measurement showed different flow patterns for different spike tips positions in respect to the primary flow direction. The electrostatic precipitator collection efficiency measurements clearly showed difference in the particle collection for both spike tips positions. Since the other electrostatic precipitator working parameters were the same, it can be concluded that the observed change of the electrohydrodynamic secondary flow was the main reason of the difference in the electrostatic precipitator collection efficiency.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this work, results of electrohydrodynamic secondary flow and particle collection efficiency measurements in an electrostatic precipitator under positive and negative voltage polarity are presented. The electrostatic precipitator had two plate collecting electrodes and a single spike discharge electrode. The spike tips were only on one side of the discharge electrode, therefore called a one-sided spike electrode. The electrohydrodynamic secondary flow pattern and collection efficiency measurements were carried out for two one-sided spike electrode positions: with the spike tips directed either upstream or downstream the primary flow. The results of the flow pattern measurement showed different flow patterns for different spike tips positions in respect to the primary flow direction. The electrostatic precipitator collection efficiency measurements clearly showed difference in the particle collection for both spike tips positions. Since the other electrostatic precipitator working parameters were the same, it can be concluded that the observed change of the electrohydrodynamic secondary flow was the main reason of the difference in the electrostatic precipitator collection efficiency.

Key concepts: Electrostatic precipitator, Electrohydrodynamics, Electrode, Secondary flow, Flow (mathematics), Voltage, Particle (ecology), Spike (software development)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electrohydrodynamic secondary flow and particle collection efficiency in a one-sided spike-plate type electrostatic precipitator — Research Paper | ScholarLens