1999The European Journal of Cognitive PsychologyRequires access

Can Students Predict When Imagery Will Allow Them to Discover the Problem Solution?

Alessandro Antonietti

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Three studies have been carried out to identify to what extent and on what grounds undergraduates realise that visual imagery can be useful to solve a problem. A series of problems had been selected according to the kind of task (logical, mathematical, geometrical, and practical) and to the objective level of imagery efficacy (as reported by previous experiments aimed at assessing the effects of mental visualisation on problem solving). Then, by means of different procedures, students were asked to rate how useful, in their opinion, mental visualisation is in solving each of such problems and to explain why they thought it is useful. Results showed that usefulness scores were highly consistent and were not affected by gender, course of study attended, and individual differences in imagery (vividness, control, and cognitive style). Undergraduates rated imagery as useful above all when problems deal with concrete situations, whereas mental images were not perceived as possible aids for abstract or conceptual problems. The subjective evaluation did not correspond to the objective effect. However, when a specific imagery strategy was described, the discrepancy between the subjective and objective measures decreased.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three studies have been carried out to identify to what extent and on what grounds undergraduates realise that visual imagery can be useful to solve a problem. A series of problems had been selected according to the kind of task (logical, mathematical, geometrical, and practical) and to the objective level of imagery efficacy (as reported by previous experiments aimed at assessing the effects of mental visualisation on problem solving). Then, by means of different procedures, students were asked to rate how useful, in their opinion, mental visualisation is in solving each of such problems and to explain why they thought it is useful. Results showed that usefulness scores were highly consistent and were not affected by gender, course of study attended, and individual differences in imagery (vividness, control, and cognitive style). Undergraduates rated imagery as useful above all when problems deal with concrete situations, whereas mental images were not perceived as possible aids for abstract or conceptual problems. The subjective evaluation did not correspond to the objective effect. However, when a specific imagery strategy was described, the discrepancy between the subjective and objective measures decreased.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three studies have been carried out to identify to what extent and on what grounds undergraduates realise that visual imagery can be useful to solve a problem. A series of problems had been selected according to the kind of task (logical, mathematical, geometrical, and practical) and to the objective level of imagery efficacy (as reported by previous experiments aimed at assessing the effects of mental visualisation on problem solving). Then, by means of different procedures, students were asked to rate how useful, in their opinion, mental visualisation is in solving each of such problems and to explain why they thought it is useful. Results showed that usefulness scores were highly consistent and were not affected by gender, course of study attended, and individual differences in imagery (vividness, control, and cognitive style). Undergraduates rated imagery as useful above all when problems deal with concrete situations, whereas mental images were not perceived as possible aids for abstract or conceptual problems. The subjective evaluation did not correspond to the objective effect. However, when a specific imagery strategy was described, the discrepancy between the subjective and objective measures decreased.

Key concepts: Mental image, Psychology, Creative visualization, Task (project management), Cognitive psychology, Visualization, Cognition, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Can Students Predict When Imagery Will Allow Them to Discover the Problem Solution? — Research Paper | ScholarLens