1977•SedimentologyRequires access

Threshold of sediment motion under unidirectional currents

Martin C. Miller, I Nick McCave, Paul D. Komar

Open publisher page 992 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Carefully selected data for the threshold of sediment movement under unidirectional flow conditions have been utilized to re‐examine the various empirical curves that are commonly employed to predict this threshold. After a review of the existing data, we employed only that data obtained from open channel flumes with parallel sidewalls where flows were uniform and steady over flattened beds of unigranular, rounded sediments. Without these restrictions, an unmanageable amount of scatter is introduced. This selected data is used to develop a modified Shields‐type threshold diagram that extends the limits of the original diagram by three orders of magnitude in the grain‐Reynolds number. The equally general but more easily employed Yalin diagram for sediment threshold is also examined. Although the Shields and Yalin diagrams are general in that they apply to a wide range of different liquids, in both cases somewhat different curves are obtained for threshold under air than for the liquids. The often used empirical curves of the friction velocity u * , the velocity 100 cm above the bed u 100 , the bottom stress θ t , and Shields’ relative stress θ t , all versus the grain diameter D , are limited in their ranges of application to certain combinations of grain density, fluid density, fluid viscosity and gravity. These conditions must be selected before the curves are generated from either the more general Shields or Yalin curves. For example, on the basis of the data selected for use in this paper, empirical threshold relationships for quartz density material in water are image where the velocity u 100 measured 100 cm above the sediment bed is given in cm/sec and the grain diameter D is in cm. The limitations on any of the threshold relationships are severe. These limitations should be properly understood so that the empirical curves and relationships are not improperly employed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Carefully selected data for the threshold of sediment movement under unidirectional flow conditions have been utilized to re‐examine the various empirical curves that are commonly employed to predict this threshold. After a review of the existing data, we employed only that data obtained from open channel flumes with parallel sidewalls where flows were uniform and steady over flattened beds of unigranular, rounded sediments. Without these restrictions, an unmanageable amount of scatter is introduced. This selected data is used to develop a modified Shields‐type threshold diagram that extends the limits of the original diagram by three orders of magnitude in the grain‐Reynolds number. The equally general but more easily employed Yalin diagram for sediment threshold is also examined. Although the Shields and Yalin diagrams are general in that they apply to a wide range of different liquids, in both cases somewhat different curves are obtained for threshold under air than for the liquids. The often used empirical curves of the friction velocity u * , the velocity 100 cm above the bed u 100 , the bottom stress θ t , and Shields’ relative stress θ t , all versus the grain diameter D , are limited in their ranges of application to certain combinations of grain density, fluid density, fluid viscosity and gravity. These conditions must be selected before the curves are generated from either the more general Shields or Yalin curves. For example, on the basis of the data selected for use in this paper, empirical threshold relationships for quartz density material in water are image where the velocity u 100 measured 100 cm above the sediment bed is given in cm/sec and the grain diameter D is in cm. The limitations on any of the threshold relationships are severe. These limitations should be properly understood so that the empirical curves and relationships are not improperly employed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 992 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Carefully selected data for the threshold of sediment movement under unidirectional flow conditions have been utilized to re‐examine the various empirical curves that are commonly employed to predict this threshold. After a review of the existing data, we employed only that data obtained from open channel flumes with parallel sidewalls where flows were uniform and steady over flattened beds of unigranular, rounded sediments. Without these restrictions, an unmanageable amount of scatter is introduced. This selected data is used to develop a modified Shields‐type threshold diagram that extends the limits of the original diagram by three orders of magnitude in the grain‐Reynolds number. The equally general but more easily employed Yalin diagram for sediment threshold is also examined. Although the Shields and Yalin diagrams are general in that they apply to a wide range of different liquids, in both cases somewhat different curves are obtained for threshold under air than for the liquids. The often used empirical curves of the friction velocity u * , the velocity 100 cm above the bed u 100 , the bottom stress θ t , and Shields’ relative stress θ t , all versus the grain diameter D , are limited in their ranges of application to certain combinations of grain density, fluid density, fluid viscosity and gravity. These conditions must be selected before the curves are generated from either the more general Shields or Yalin curves. For example, on the basis of the data selected for use in this paper, empirical threshold relationships for quartz density material in water are image where the velocity u 100 measured 100 cm above the sediment bed is given in cm/sec and the grain diameter D is in cm. The limitations on any of the threshold relationships are severe. These limitations should be properly understood so that the empirical curves and relationships are not improperly employed.

Key concepts: Diagram, Geology, Mechanics, Flow (mathematics), Viscosity, Shields, Sediment, Grain size

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Threshold of sediment motion under unidirectional currents — Research Paper | ScholarLens