1975Crop ScienceRequires access

Yield Potential in a Dwarf Spring Wheat and the Effect of Shading1

R. A. Fischer

Open publisher page 190 citations

Abstract

A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons. Single shading treatments of approximately four (1971, 1972), three (1973), and two (1974) weeks duration and various intensities were used to elucidate the importance for grain yield of radiation and crop photosynthesis at different stages of development. Shading always reduced crop growth, approximately in direct proportion to the reduction in radiation. Grain yield reduction was however curvilinearly related to radiation such that small reductions had little effect on yield at any developmental stage. Yield reductions with heavier shading only occurred with shading after about 60 days after seeding and were greater before anthesis (90 days) than after anthesis, especially in 1973. The shorter shading treatments indicated that the period of rapid spike growth, approximately 35 to 5 days before anthesis, was that showing greatest sensitivity to shading. Shading then led to fewer spikes/m2 (lower tiller survival) and fewer grains/splkelet (fewer florets produced), hence reduced grains/m2 Responses to post‐anthesis shading suggest that the degree of yield limitation by post‐anthesis photosynthesis is not constant for a given genotype, varying substantially from year to year. Thus in 1973 immediate pre‐anthesis conditions were unfavorable due to cloudiness, grains/m2 was low, and yield was entirely limited by this factor. In other years, yield was more sensitive to post‐anthesis shading. However it is concluded that grains/m2, hence crop photosynthesis in the immediate pre‐anthesis period, is the key to higher yield in this cultivar.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons. Single shading treatments of approximately four (1971, 1972), three (1973), and two (1974) weeks duration and various intensities were used to elucidate the importance for grain yield of radiation and crop photosynthesis at different stages of development. Shading always reduced crop growth, approximately in direct proportion to the reduction in radiation. Grain yield reduction was however curvilinearly related to radiation such that small reductions had little effect on yield at any developmental stage. Yield reductions with heavier shading only occurred with shading after about 60 days after seeding and were greater before anthesis (90 days) than after anthesis, especially in 1973. The shorter shading treatments indicated that the period of rapid spike growth, approximately 35 to 5 days before anthesis, was that showing greatest sensitivity to shading. Shading then led to fewer spikes/m2 (lower tiller survival) and fewer grains/splkelet (fewer florets produced), hence reduced grains/m2 Responses to post‐anthesis shading suggest that the degree of yield limitation by post‐anthesis photosynthesis is not constant for a given genotype, varying substantially from year to year. Thus in 1973 immediate pre‐anthesis conditions were unfavorable due to cloudiness, grains/m2 was low, and yield was entirely limited by this factor. In other years, yield was more sensitive to post‐anthesis shading. However it is concluded that grains/m2, hence crop photosynthesis in the immediate pre‐anthesis period, is the key to higher yield in this cultivar.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 190 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons. Single shading treatments of approximately four (1971, 1972), three (1973), and two (1974) weeks duration and various intensities were used to elucidate the importance for grain yield of radiation and crop photosynthesis at different stages of development. Shading always reduced crop growth, approximately in direct proportion to the reduction in radiation. Grain yield reduction was however curvilinearly related to radiation such that small reductions had little effect on yield at any developmental stage. Yield reductions with heavier shading only occurred with shading after about 60 days after seeding and were greater before anthesis (90 days) than after anthesis, especially in 1973. The shorter shading treatments indicated that the period of rapid spike growth, approximately 35 to 5 days before anthesis, was that showing greatest sensitivity to shading. Shading then led to fewer spikes/m2 (lower tiller survival) and fewer grains/splkelet (fewer florets produced), hence reduced grains/m2 Responses to post‐anthesis shading suggest that the degree of yield limitation by post‐anthesis photosynthesis is not constant for a given genotype, varying substantially from year to year. Thus in 1973 immediate pre‐anthesis conditions were unfavorable due to cloudiness, grains/m2 was low, and yield was entirely limited by this factor. In other years, yield was more sensitive to post‐anthesis shading. However it is concluded that grains/m2, hence crop photosynthesis in the immediate pre‐anthesis period, is the key to higher yield in this cultivar.

Key concepts: Shading, Anthesis, Agronomy, Photosynthesis, Biology, Tiller (botany), Photosynthetically active radiation, Crop

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Yield Potential in a Dwarf Spring Wheat and the Effect of Shading1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens