1982AnaesthesiaRequires access

Anaesthesia for Caesarean section. The potential for regional block

Atara Davis

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

This study of the obstetric and anaesthetic circumstances relating to 100 consecutive Caesarean sections under general anaesthesia suggests that the general anaesthesia rate for Caesarean section could be reduced from the present 37 to 27% by making maximum use of epidural block and to 16% by using subarachnoid block in addition. The need for general anaesthesia on account of urgency to deliver can be greatly reduced by the administration of epidural analgesia during labour in patients identified as being more likely than average to require Caesarean section, and by the use of subarachnoid block when the need for section arises unexpectantly. Patients' objections to undergoing Caesarean section while conscious were analysed, and suggestions are made for minimising the number of patients who decline. Technical problems with blocks may sometimes be overcome without resort to general anaesthesia, while patients at risk from haemorrhage or coagulopathy will continue to require general anaesthesia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study of the obstetric and anaesthetic circumstances relating to 100 consecutive Caesarean sections under general anaesthesia suggests that the general anaesthesia rate for Caesarean section could be reduced from the present 37 to 27% by making maximum use of epidural block and to 16% by using subarachnoid block in addition. The need for general anaesthesia on account of urgency to deliver can be greatly reduced by the administration of epidural analgesia during labour in patients identified as being more likely than average to require Caesarean section, and by the use of subarachnoid block when the need for section arises unexpectantly. Patients' objections to undergoing Caesarean section while conscious were analysed, and suggestions are made for minimising the number of patients who decline. Technical problems with blocks may sometimes be overcome without resort to general anaesthesia, while patients at risk from haemorrhage or coagulopathy will continue to require general anaesthesia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study of the obstetric and anaesthetic circumstances relating to 100 consecutive Caesarean sections under general anaesthesia suggests that the general anaesthesia rate for Caesarean section could be reduced from the present 37 to 27% by making maximum use of epidural block and to 16% by using subarachnoid block in addition. The need for general anaesthesia on account of urgency to deliver can be greatly reduced by the administration of epidural analgesia during labour in patients identified as being more likely than average to require Caesarean section, and by the use of subarachnoid block when the need for section arises unexpectantly. Patients' objections to undergoing Caesarean section while conscious were analysed, and suggestions are made for minimising the number of patients who decline. Technical problems with blocks may sometimes be overcome without resort to general anaesthesia, while patients at risk from haemorrhage or coagulopathy will continue to require general anaesthesia.

Key concepts: Caesarean section, Medicine, General anaesthesia, Anesthesia, Regional anaesthesia, General anaesthetic, Epidural block, Pregnancy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Anaesthesia for Caesarean section. The potential for regional block — Research Paper | ScholarLens