1984Physics TodayRequires access

The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes

S. Chandrasekhar, Allen I. Janis

Open publisher page 2,290 citations

Abstract

In a course of lectures on the ‘underlying mathematical structures of classical gravitation theory’ given in 1978, Brandon Carter began with the statement ‘If I had been asked five years ago to prepare a course of lectures on recent developments in classical gravitation theory, I would not have hesitated on the classical theory of black holes as a central topic of discussion. However, the most important developments in gravitational theory during the last three or four years have not been in the classical domain at all…’ Carter is undoubtedly right in his assessment that the mathematical theory of black holes has not been in the mainstream of research in relativity since 1973. I therefore find it difficult to understand why the organizers of this meeting should have chosen precisely this topic for the opening talk of this meeting. But I am grateful to them for their courtesy in assigning to me this privilege.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a course of lectures on the ‘underlying mathematical structures of classical gravitation theory’ given in 1978, Brandon Carter began with the statement ‘If I had been asked five years ago to prepare a course of lectures on recent developments in classical gravitation theory, I would not have hesitated on the classical theory of black holes as a central topic of discussion. However, the most important developments in gravitational theory during the last three or four years have not been in the classical domain at all…’ Carter is undoubtedly right in his assessment that the mathematical theory of black holes has not been in the mainstream of research in relativity since 1973. I therefore find it difficult to understand why the organizers of this meeting should have chosen precisely this topic for the opening talk of this meeting. But I am grateful to them for their courtesy in assigning to me this privilege.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2290 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a course of lectures on the ‘underlying mathematical structures of classical gravitation theory’ given in 1978, Brandon Carter began with the statement ‘If I had been asked five years ago to prepare a course of lectures on recent developments in classical gravitation theory, I would not have hesitated on the classical theory of black holes as a central topic of discussion. However, the most important developments in gravitational theory during the last three or four years have not been in the classical domain at all…’ Carter is undoubtedly right in his assessment that the mathematical theory of black holes has not been in the mainstream of research in relativity since 1973. I therefore find it difficult to understand why the organizers of this meeting should have chosen precisely this topic for the opening talk of this meeting. But I am grateful to them for their courtesy in assigning to me this privilege.

Key concepts: Theoretical physics, Gravitation, Privilege (computing), Statement (logic), General relativity, Physics, Epistemology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes — Research Paper | ScholarLens