1993•Archives of SurgeryRequires access

Manometry of Individual Segments of the Distal Esophageal Sphincter

Peter F. Crookes

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The major components of the lower esophageal sphincter, the pressure it exerts, its total length, and the length of sphincter affected by abdominal pressure are usually expressed as means of several recordings from different radial segments of the sphincter. In segmental manometry, the individual readings for these components in each segment, rather than the mean values, are analyzed. We used segmental manometry to study 50 normal volunteers and 200 patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux. Of the latter, 100 had increased esophageal acid exposure and 100 did not. An increased number of defective segments was associated with a greater prevalence of increased esophageal acid exposure. Segmental analysis disclosed the same number (52) of defective sphincters (defined as sphincters with two or more defective segments) in the 100 patients with increased acid exposure as did standard analysis. However, the relationship between a defective lower esophageal sphincter and the number of reflux episodes was clearer when a defective sphincter was defined using standard analysis. Segmental analysis of the lower esophageal sphincter has no clear advantage over standard analysis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The major components of the lower esophageal sphincter, the pressure it exerts, its total length, and the length of sphincter affected by abdominal pressure are usually expressed as means of several recordings from different radial segments of the sphincter. In segmental manometry, the individual readings for these components in each segment, rather than the mean values, are analyzed. We used segmental manometry to study 50 normal volunteers and 200 patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux. Of the latter, 100 had increased esophageal acid exposure and 100 did not. An increased number of defective segments was associated with a greater prevalence of increased esophageal acid exposure. Segmental analysis disclosed the same number (52) of defective sphincters (defined as sphincters with two or more defective segments) in the 100 patients with increased acid exposure as did standard analysis. However, the relationship between a defective lower esophageal sphincter and the number of reflux episodes was clearer when a defective sphincter was defined using standard analysis. Segmental analysis of the lower esophageal sphincter has no clear advantage over standard analysis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The major components of the lower esophageal sphincter, the pressure it exerts, its total length, and the length of sphincter affected by abdominal pressure are usually expressed as means of several recordings from different radial segments of the sphincter. In segmental manometry, the individual readings for these components in each segment, rather than the mean values, are analyzed. We used segmental manometry to study 50 normal volunteers and 200 patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux. Of the latter, 100 had increased esophageal acid exposure and 100 did not. An increased number of defective segments was associated with a greater prevalence of increased esophageal acid exposure. Segmental analysis disclosed the same number (52) of defective sphincters (defined as sphincters with two or more defective segments) in the 100 patients with increased acid exposure as did standard analysis. However, the relationship between a defective lower esophageal sphincter and the number of reflux episodes was clearer when a defective sphincter was defined using standard analysis. Segmental analysis of the lower esophageal sphincter has no clear advantage over standard analysis.

Key concepts: Esophageal sphincter, Sphincter, Medicine, Reflux, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Surgery, Disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Manometry of Individual Segments of the Distal Esophageal Sphincter — Research Paper | ScholarLens