2007•Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)Requires access

Determination of the hepatitis C virus subtype: comparison of sequencing and reverse hybridization assays

Evelyn Stelzl, Carola van der Meer, Remko A. T. W. Gouw, Marcel Beld, Maja Grahovac, Egon Marth, Harald H. Kessler

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping and accurate subtyping is becoming increasingly relevant to epidemiological studies, clinical management, pathogenicity, and vaccine development. METHODS: The TRUGENE HCV 5'NC Genotyping Kit, the new VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA), and a new laboratory-developed HCV NS5b sequencing assay designed for automated sequencing of the HCV NS5b region were used. Clinical samples and a molecular diagnostics HCV genotyping proficiency program panel were used to determine accuracy and differentiate performance characteristics of the three methods. RESULTS: All amplified samples from among the members of a HCV genotyping proficiency program panel that contained a single HCV genotype were subtyped correctly using all three HCV genotyping assays. With the TRUGENE HCV 5'NC Genotyping Kit, the HCV subtype was determined in 357 of 441 of routine clinical samples. When the 84 samples with only genotype results were retested with the VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA), 61 could be further subtyped accurately. With the new laboratory-developed HCV NS5b sequencing assay, all 84 could be subtyped accurately. CONCLUSIONS: The two new methods show advantages over the routinely used TRUGENE HCV 5'NC Genotyping Kit in terms of genotyping and subtyping accuracy by utilizing part of the HCV core region and NS5b region, respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping and accurate subtyping is becoming increasingly relevant to epidemiological studies, clinical management, pathogenicity, and vaccine development. METHODS: The TRUGENE HCV 5'NC Genotyping Kit, the new VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA), and a new laboratory-developed HCV NS5b sequencing assay designed for automated sequencing of the HCV NS5b region were used. Clinical samples and a molecular diagnostics HCV genotyping proficiency program panel were used to determine accuracy and differentiate performance characteristics of the three methods. RESULTS: All amplified samples from among the members of a HCV genotyping proficiency program panel that contained a single HCV genotype were subtyped correctly using all three HCV genotyping assays. With the TRUGENE HCV 5'NC Genotyping Kit, the HCV subtype was determined in 357 of 441 of routine clinical samples. When the 84 samples with only genotype results were retested with the VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA), 61 could be further subtyped accurately. With the new laboratory-developed HCV NS5b sequencing assay, all 84 could be subtyped accurately. CONCLUSIONS: The two new methods show advantages over the routinely used TRUGENE HCV 5'NC Genotyping Kit in terms of genotyping and subtyping accuracy by utilizing part of the HCV core region and NS5b region, respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping and accurate subtyping is becoming increasingly relevant to epidemiological studies, clinical management, pathogenicity, and vaccine development. METHODS: The TRUGENE HCV 5'NC Genotyping Kit, the new VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA), and a new laboratory-developed HCV NS5b sequencing assay designed for automated sequencing of the HCV NS5b region were used. Clinical samples and a molecular diagnostics HCV genotyping proficiency program panel were used to determine accuracy and differentiate performance characteristics of the three methods. RESULTS: All amplified samples from among the members of a HCV genotyping proficiency program panel that contained a single HCV genotype were subtyped correctly using all three HCV genotyping assays. With the TRUGENE HCV 5'NC Genotyping Kit, the HCV subtype was determined in 357 of 441 of routine clinical samples. When the 84 samples with only genotype results were retested with the VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA), 61 could be further subtyped accurately. With the new laboratory-developed HCV NS5b sequencing assay, all 84 could be subtyped accurately. CONCLUSIONS: The two new methods show advantages over the routinely used TRUGENE HCV 5'NC Genotyping Kit in terms of genotyping and subtyping accuracy by utilizing part of the HCV core region and NS5b region, respectively.

Key concepts: Subtyping, Genotyping, Virology, Genotype, Hepatitis C virus, Virus, Biology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Determination of the hepatitis C virus subtype: comparison of sequencing and reverse hybridization assays — Research Paper | ScholarLens