Neither chimpanzee nor human, Ardipithecus reveals the surprising ancestry of both
Tim D. White, C. Owen Lovejoy, Berhane Asfaw, Joshua P. Carlson, Gen Suwa
Abstract
Open-access reader
Tim D. White, C. Owen Lovejoy, Berhane Asfaw, Joshua P. Carlson, Gen Suwa
Abstract
Open-access reader
Australopithecus fossils were regularly interpreted during the late 20th century in a framework that used living African apes, especially chimpanzees, as proxies for the immediate ancestors of the human clade. Such projection is now largely nullified by the discovery of Ardipithecus. In the context of accumulating evidence from genetics, developmental biology, anatomy, ecology, biogeography, and geology, Ardipithecus alters perspectives on how our earliest hominid ancestors--and our closest living relatives--evolved.
OpenAlex reports 219 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Australopithecus fossils were regularly interpreted during the late 20th century in a framework that used living African apes, especially chimpanzees, as proxies for the immediate ancestors of the human clade. Such projection is now largely nullified by the discovery of Ardipithecus. In the context of accumulating evidence from genetics, developmental biology, anatomy, ecology, biogeography, and geology, Ardipithecus alters perspectives on how our earliest hominid ancestors--and our closest living relatives--evolved.
Key concepts: Hominidae, Human evolution, Australopithecus, Evolutionary biology, Biogeography, Living fossil, Clade, Biology