2014PancreasRequires access

Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in Distal Pancreatectomy

Hangyan Wang, Dianrong Xiu, Bin Jiang, Chaolai Ma, Chunhui Yuan

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and readmission remain the significant sources of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (DP). We describe a technique of drainage and postoperation management to prevent severe POPF and readmission. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 57 patients who underwent DP from January 2009 to November 2011 was conducted. The drain was placed just abutting the pancreatic stump by suturing the tissue near the stump. Each patient was discharged carrying an intraabdominal drain, and a strict follow-up was made in the outpatient clinic. Postoperative pancreatic fistula was defined using the international study group classification for pancreatic fistula definition. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients accepted laparoscopic DP (LDP), and 25 patients accepted open DP (ODP). There was no significant difference in the rate of POPF between the 2 groups (12/32 vs 11/25, P = 0.786). All the POPF cases were grades A and B, but no case was grade C. No case needed a specific intervention. There was no reoperation, readmission, intraabdominal abscess, or surgical site infection. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that our technique of drainage and postoperation management is associated with a low incidence of severe POPF and readmission. Continued investigation of this technique is warranted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and readmission remain the significant sources of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (DP). We describe a technique of drainage and postoperation management to prevent severe POPF and readmission. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 57 patients who underwent DP from January 2009 to November 2011 was conducted. The drain was placed just abutting the pancreatic stump by suturing the tissue near the stump. Each patient was discharged carrying an intraabdominal drain, and a strict follow-up was made in the outpatient clinic. Postoperative pancreatic fistula was defined using the international study group classification for pancreatic fistula definition. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients accepted laparoscopic DP (LDP), and 25 patients accepted open DP (ODP). There was no significant difference in the rate of POPF between the 2 groups (12/32 vs 11/25, P = 0.786). All the POPF cases were grades A and B, but no case was grade C. No case needed a specific intervention. There was no reoperation, readmission, intraabdominal abscess, or surgical site infection. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that our technique of drainage and postoperation management is associated with a low incidence of severe POPF and readmission. Continued investigation of this technique is warranted.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and readmission remain the significant sources of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (DP). We describe a technique of drainage and postoperation management to prevent severe POPF and readmission. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 57 patients who underwent DP from January 2009 to November 2011 was conducted. The drain was placed just abutting the pancreatic stump by suturing the tissue near the stump. Each patient was discharged carrying an intraabdominal drain, and a strict follow-up was made in the outpatient clinic. Postoperative pancreatic fistula was defined using the international study group classification for pancreatic fistula definition. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients accepted laparoscopic DP (LDP), and 25 patients accepted open DP (ODP). There was no significant difference in the rate of POPF between the 2 groups (12/32 vs 11/25, P = 0.786). All the POPF cases were grades A and B, but no case was grade C. No case needed a specific intervention. There was no reoperation, readmission, intraabdominal abscess, or surgical site infection. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that our technique of drainage and postoperation management is associated with a low incidence of severe POPF and readmission. Continued investigation of this technique is warranted.

Key concepts: Pancreatic fistula, Pancreatectomy, Medicine, Distal pancreatectomy, General surgery, Fistula, Pancreas, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in Distal Pancreatectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens