2008Journal of Engineering EducationRequires access

Impacts of Teaching Approaches on Learning Approaches of Construction Engineering Students: A Comparative Study between Hong Kong and Mainland China

Mei‐yung Leung, LU Xin-hong, Dongyu Chen, Mei Lu

Open publisher page 44 citations

Abstract

Abstract Teaching and learning contexts influence the learning process and determine the learning outcome or product. Teaching approaches may vary across different engineering and science courses and students. This study was aimed at understanding the differences in teaching approaches between two regions (Hong Kong and mainland China) and their relevant impacts on the learning process in construction engineering education. An exploratory survey was conducted on construction engineering students in China to investigate relationships between teaching approaches, learning approaches, and teaching satisfaction. Results indicate that the “transferring” and “shaping” teaching approaches are commonly used in the first and second class universities in the mainland, while the “transferring” and “traveling” approaches are commonly applied in Hong Kong. Teacher‐centered teaching is correlated to a “surface” learning approach among students at Hong Kong universities but it is correlated to a “deep” learning approach for students in the mainland. Students at universities in mainland China are satisfied with all four teaching approaches, “transferring,” “shaping,” “traveling,” and “growing;” while students in Hong Kong are only significantly satisfied with the “growing” teaching approach.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Teaching and learning contexts influence the learning process and determine the learning outcome or product. Teaching approaches may vary across different engineering and science courses and students. This study was aimed at understanding the differences in teaching approaches between two regions (Hong Kong and mainland China) and their relevant impacts on the learning process in construction engineering education. An exploratory survey was conducted on construction engineering students in China to investigate relationships between teaching approaches, learning approaches, and teaching satisfaction. Results indicate that the “transferring” and “shaping” teaching approaches are commonly used in the first and second class universities in the mainland, while the “transferring” and “traveling” approaches are commonly applied in Hong Kong. Teacher‐centered teaching is correlated to a “surface” learning approach among students at Hong Kong universities but it is correlated to a “deep” learning approach for students in the mainland. Students at universities in mainland China are satisfied with all four teaching approaches, “transferring,” “shaping,” “traveling,” and “growing;” while students in Hong Kong are only significantly satisfied with the “growing” teaching approach.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Teaching and learning contexts influence the learning process and determine the learning outcome or product. Teaching approaches may vary across different engineering and science courses and students. This study was aimed at understanding the differences in teaching approaches between two regions (Hong Kong and mainland China) and their relevant impacts on the learning process in construction engineering education. An exploratory survey was conducted on construction engineering students in China to investigate relationships between teaching approaches, learning approaches, and teaching satisfaction. Results indicate that the “transferring” and “shaping” teaching approaches are commonly used in the first and second class universities in the mainland, while the “transferring” and “traveling” approaches are commonly applied in Hong Kong. Teacher‐centered teaching is correlated to a “surface” learning approach among students at Hong Kong universities but it is correlated to a “deep” learning approach for students in the mainland. Students at universities in mainland China are satisfied with all four teaching approaches, “transferring,” “shaping,” “traveling,” and “growing;” while students in Hong Kong are only significantly satisfied with the “growing” teaching approach.

Key concepts: Mainland China, Mainland, China, Teaching method, Mathematics education, Process (computing), Class (philosophy), Teaching and learning center

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impacts of Teaching Approaches on Learning Approaches of Construction Engineering Students: A Comparative Study between Hong Kong and Mainland China — Research Paper | ScholarLens