2007•Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresOpen access

Reasons why some solar wind changes do not trigger substorms

D.‐Y. Lee, Larry R. Lyons, James Michael Weygand, Chih‐Ping Wang

Open full text 17 citations

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that a northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) or a reduction in the magnitude of IMF By component can trigger a substorm. Also a solar wind dynamic pressure enhancement has been found to trigger a substorm under strongly southward IMF conditions. Solar wind changes directed opposite to those of, or not satisfying the conditions of, these known triggers may be considered as inherently nontriggers. In the present paper we have examined 12 events where more than one solar wind quantity change simultaneously and no substorm is triggered. We suggest that nontriggering by the solar wind changes studied in the present work can be explained by the following three reasons: (1) there is a lack of, or insufficient, substorm growth phase development prior to the potential triggering change; (2) the solar wind change is an inherently nontriggering change; (3) the nullifying effect occurs, where one quantity changes in the direction of a substorm trigger and simultaneously another quantity changes in the direction opposite to that of a trigger. The nontriggering types found in this study are consistent with the suggestion that variations of the solar wind that do not reduce the convection strength within the inner plasma sheet do not trigger substorms, which is opposite to what is expected from a triggering solar wind variation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Previous studies have shown that a northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) or a reduction in the magnitude of IMF By component can trigger a substorm. Also a solar wind dynamic pressure enhancement has been found to trigger a substorm under strongly southward IMF conditions. Solar wind changes directed opposite to those of, or not satisfying the conditions of, these known triggers may be considered as inherently nontriggers. In the present paper we have examined 12 events where more than one solar wind quantity change simultaneously and no substorm is triggered. We suggest that nontriggering by the solar wind changes studied in the present work can be explained by the following three reasons: (1) there is a lack of, or insufficient, substorm growth phase development prior to the potential triggering change; (2) the solar wind change is an inherently nontriggering change; (3) the nullifying effect occurs, where one quantity changes in the direction of a substorm trigger and simultaneously another quantity changes in the direction opposite to that of a trigger. The nontriggering types found in this study are consistent with the suggestion that variations of the solar wind that do not reduce the convection strength within the inner plasma sheet do not trigger substorms, which is opposite to what is expected from a triggering solar wind variation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Previous studies have shown that a northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) or a reduction in the magnitude of IMF By component can trigger a substorm. Also a solar wind dynamic pressure enhancement has been found to trigger a substorm under strongly southward IMF conditions. Solar wind changes directed opposite to those of, or not satisfying the conditions of, these known triggers may be considered as inherently nontriggers. In the present paper we have examined 12 events where more than one solar wind quantity change simultaneously and no substorm is triggered. We suggest that nontriggering by the solar wind changes studied in the present work can be explained by the following three reasons: (1) there is a lack of, or insufficient, substorm growth phase development prior to the potential triggering change; (2) the solar wind change is an inherently nontriggering change; (3) the nullifying effect occurs, where one quantity changes in the direction of a substorm trigger and simultaneously another quantity changes in the direction opposite to that of a trigger. The nontriggering types found in this study are consistent with the suggestion that variations of the solar wind that do not reduce the convection strength within the inner plasma sheet do not trigger substorms, which is opposite to what is expected from a triggering solar wind variation.

Key concepts: Substorm, Solar wind, Interplanetary magnetic field, Geophysics, Plasma sheet, Atmospheric sciences, Physics, Magnetopause

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reasons why some solar wind changes do not trigger substorms — Research Paper | ScholarLens