2001•Geological Society of America BulletinRequires access

Foreland-basin sequence response to collisional tectonism

James W. Castle

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

Research Article| July 01, 2001 Foreland-basin sequence response to collisional tectonism James W. Castle James W. Castle 1Department of Geological Sciences, Box 340976, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0976, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information James W. Castle 1Department of Geological Sciences, Box 340976, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0976, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 25 Feb 2000 Revision Received: 01 Sep 2000 Accepted: 24 Oct 2000 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2001) 113 (7): 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0801:FBSRTC>2.0.CO;2 Article history Received: 25 Feb 2000 Revision Received: 01 Sep 2000 Accepted: 24 Oct 2000 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation James W. Castle; Foreland-basin sequence response to collisional tectonism. GSA Bulletin 2001;; 113 (7): 801–812. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0801:FBSRTC>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract As structural salients and recesses evolved from reentrants and promontories along the collisional continental margin associated with the Taconic orogeny, cross- strike structural features provided a mechanism for transferring zones of relative subsidence and uplift across the Appalachian foreland basin. The regional distribution of Lower Silurian clastic sequences reflects this tectonic influence. Thick, aggradational sequences formed in areas corresponding to salients in response to high rates of sediment supply and creation of sediment accommodation. As the rate of sediment supply exceeded the rate of accommodation added, shoreline progradation onto the distal foreland ramp produced upward-coarsening sequences. In areas of structural recesses, accommodation was created by erosion during sea-level fall and lowstand. Upward-fining sequences formed as the topographic lows were filled during subsequent sea-level rise.Results from this investigation indicate that predictable variations in foreland-basin deposition and in the resulting stratigraphic pattern occur along regional tectonic strike as well as in the dip direction. The thickness of foreland-ramp sequences is greater in areas of salients than in recesses, whereas the ratio of sandstone to total thickness is greater in the recesses. Aggradational sequences grading laterally into upward-coarsening progradational sequences of the distal ramp characterize areas of relative subsidence, which provides a mechanism for creating sediment accommodation. In contrast, deep erosion, common unconformities, and incised valley fills are present in areas corresponding to recesses, where the rate of eustatic fall commonly exceeds the subsidence rate. These along-strike stratigraphic variations in response to collisional tectonism should be considered in the interpretation of other foreland-basin successions. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Research Article| July 01, 2001 Foreland-basin sequence response to collisional tectonism James W. Castle James W. Castle 1Department of Geological Sciences, Box 340976, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0976, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information James W. Castle 1Department of Geological Sciences, Box 340976, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0976, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 25 Feb 2000 Revision Received: 01 Sep 2000 Accepted: 24 Oct 2000 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2001) 113 (7): 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0801:FBSRTC>2.0.CO;2 Article history Received: 25 Feb 2000 Revision Received: 01 Sep 2000 Accepted: 24 Oct 2000 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation James W. Castle; Foreland-basin sequence response to collisional tectonism. GSA Bulletin 2001;; 113 (7): 801–812. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0801:FBSRTC>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract As structural salients and recesses evolved from reentrants and promontories along the collisional continental margin associated with the Taconic orogeny, cross- strike structural features provided a mechanism for transferring zones of relative subsidence and uplift across the Appalachian foreland basin. The regional distribution of Lower Silurian clastic sequences reflects this tectonic influence. Thick, aggradational sequences formed in areas corresponding to salients in response to high rates of sediment supply and creation of sediment accommodation. As the rate of sediment supply exceeded the rate of accommodation added, shoreline progradation onto the distal foreland ramp produced upward-coarsening sequences. In areas of structural recesses, accommodation was created by erosion during sea-level fall and lowstand. Upward-fining sequences formed as the topographic lows were filled during subsequent sea-level rise.Results from this investigation indicate that predictable variations in foreland-basin deposition and in the resulting stratigraphic pattern occur along regional tectonic strike as well as in the dip direction. The thickness of foreland-ramp sequences is greater in areas of salients than in recesses, whereas the ratio of sandstone to total thickness is greater in the recesses. Aggradational sequences grading laterally into upward-coarsening progradational sequences of the distal ramp characterize areas of relative subsidence, which provides a mechanism for creating sediment accommodation. In contrast, deep erosion, common unconformities, and incised valley fills are present in areas corresponding to recesses, where the rate of eustatic fall commonly exceeds the subsidence rate. These along-strike stratigraphic variations in response to collisional tectonism should be considered in the interpretation of other foreland-basin successions. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Research Article| July 01, 2001 Foreland-basin sequence response to collisional tectonism James W. Castle James W. Castle 1Department of Geological Sciences, Box 340976, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0976, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information James W. Castle 1Department of Geological Sciences, Box 340976, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0976, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 25 Feb 2000 Revision Received: 01 Sep 2000 Accepted: 24 Oct 2000 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2001) 113 (7): 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0801:FBSRTC>2.0.CO;2 Article history Received: 25 Feb 2000 Revision Received: 01 Sep 2000 Accepted: 24 Oct 2000 First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation James W. Castle; Foreland-basin sequence response to collisional tectonism. GSA Bulletin 2001;; 113 (7): 801–812. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0801:FBSRTC>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract As structural salients and recesses evolved from reentrants and promontories along the collisional continental margin associated with the Taconic orogeny, cross- strike structural features provided a mechanism for transferring zones of relative subsidence and uplift across the Appalachian foreland basin. The regional distribution of Lower Silurian clastic sequences reflects this tectonic influence. Thick, aggradational sequences formed in areas corresponding to salients in response to high rates of sediment supply and creation of sediment accommodation. As the rate of sediment supply exceeded the rate of accommodation added, shoreline progradation onto the distal foreland ramp produced upward-coarsening sequences. In areas of structural recesses, accommodation was created by erosion during sea-level fall and lowstand. Upward-fining sequences formed as the topographic lows were filled during subsequent sea-level rise.Results from this investigation indicate that predictable variations in foreland-basin deposition and in the resulting stratigraphic pattern occur along regional tectonic strike as well as in the dip direction. The thickness of foreland-ramp sequences is greater in areas of salients than in recesses, whereas the ratio of sandstone to total thickness is greater in the recesses. Aggradational sequences grading laterally into upward-coarsening progradational sequences of the distal ramp characterize areas of relative subsidence, which provides a mechanism for creating sediment accommodation. In contrast, deep erosion, common unconformities, and incised valley fills are present in areas corresponding to recesses, where the rate of eustatic fall commonly exceeds the subsidence rate. These along-strike stratigraphic variations in response to collisional tectonism should be considered in the interpretation of other foreland-basin successions. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Key concepts: Foreland basin, Citation, Geology, Library science, Paleontology, Information retrieval, Archaeology, Structural basin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Foreland-basin sequence response to collisional tectonism — Research Paper | ScholarLens