1999SPE Eastern Regional MeetingRequires access

Coiled Tubing Conveyed Fracture Treatments: Evolution, Methodology and Field Application

Sunil N. Gulrajani, Clinton C. Olmstead

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Abstract A common limitation of fracture stimulation is the inability to control placement of a hydraulic fracture. This shortcoming compromises the effectiveness of a fracture treatment for multistage treatments during early field development, as well as single stage fracture stimulation of bypassed zones in mature reservoirs. This limitation can be overcome by integrating coiled tubing with hydraulic fracturing. This combination adds versatility to the fracturing procedure. It also permits control of fracture placement and hence can be used to improve the economic benefits associated with hydraulic fracturing. The effectiveness of coiled tubing fracturing operations can be constrained by excessive friction pressures, equipment limitations and limited fluid and proppant volumes. Its application thus requires specialized fracture fluids, additional field operational considerations, and alternative design procedures to ensure an efficient and successful fracture stimulation program. The paper initially explains the motivation for coiled tubing fracture treatments. Operational and design requirements associated with this technique are then outlined. Two case studies are finally presented to illustrate the application of the coiled tubing fracturing procedure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A common limitation of fracture stimulation is the inability to control placement of a hydraulic fracture. This shortcoming compromises the effectiveness of a fracture treatment for multistage treatments during early field development, as well as single stage fracture stimulation of bypassed zones in mature reservoirs. This limitation can be overcome by integrating coiled tubing with hydraulic fracturing. This combination adds versatility to the fracturing procedure. It also permits control of fracture placement and hence can be used to improve the economic benefits associated with hydraulic fracturing. The effectiveness of coiled tubing fracturing operations can be constrained by excessive friction pressures, equipment limitations and limited fluid and proppant volumes. Its application thus requires specialized fracture fluids, additional field operational considerations, and alternative design procedures to ensure an efficient and successful fracture stimulation program. The paper initially explains the motivation for coiled tubing fracture treatments. Operational and design requirements associated with this technique are then outlined. Two case studies are finally presented to illustrate the application of the coiled tubing fracturing procedure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A common limitation of fracture stimulation is the inability to control placement of a hydraulic fracture. This shortcoming compromises the effectiveness of a fracture treatment for multistage treatments during early field development, as well as single stage fracture stimulation of bypassed zones in mature reservoirs. This limitation can be overcome by integrating coiled tubing with hydraulic fracturing. This combination adds versatility to the fracturing procedure. It also permits control of fracture placement and hence can be used to improve the economic benefits associated with hydraulic fracturing. The effectiveness of coiled tubing fracturing operations can be constrained by excessive friction pressures, equipment limitations and limited fluid and proppant volumes. Its application thus requires specialized fracture fluids, additional field operational considerations, and alternative design procedures to ensure an efficient and successful fracture stimulation program. The paper initially explains the motivation for coiled tubing fracture treatments. Operational and design requirements associated with this technique are then outlined. Two case studies are finally presented to illustrate the application of the coiled tubing fracturing procedure.

Key concepts: Hydraulic fracturing, Coiled tubing, Well stimulation, Fracture (geology), Fracture treatment, Petroleum engineering, Fracturing fluid, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coiled Tubing Conveyed Fracture Treatments: Evolution, Methodology and Field Application — Research Paper | ScholarLens