1983Stain TechnologyRequires access

Staining Problems with Eosin Y: A Note from the Biological Stain Commission

Eric A. Schenk, Charles J. Churukian, Charles Willis, Elmer Stotz

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

In 1980, eosin Y was the certified dye with which technologists encountered most problems. The specific problem most frequently brought to the attention of the Biological Stain Commission was that solutions of eosin Y formed a precipitate and failed to stain cytoplasm red when used as a counterstain to hematoxylin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1980, eosin Y was the certified dye with which technologists encountered most problems. The specific problem most frequently brought to the attention of the Biological Stain Commission was that solutions of eosin Y formed a precipitate and failed to stain cytoplasm red when used as a counterstain to hematoxylin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1980, eosin Y was the certified dye with which technologists encountered most problems. The specific problem most frequently brought to the attention of the Biological Stain Commission was that solutions of eosin Y formed a precipitate and failed to stain cytoplasm red when used as a counterstain to hematoxylin.

Key concepts: Stain, H&E stain, Eosin, Staining, Eosin Y, Commission, Chemistry, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Staining Problems with Eosin Y: A Note from the Biological Stain Commission — Research Paper | ScholarLens