2006The Journal of Poultry ScienceOpen access

Bioequivalence Comparison of Seventeen Commercial Oral Enrofloxacins against the Original Pioneer Preparation in Broilers

Héctor Sumano López, Lilia Gutiérrez, Luis Ocampo

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Considering the importance of fluoroquinolones in animal health and the fact that the enrofloxacin patent has expired, a bioequivalence study of seventeen preparations of enrofloxacin vs. the reference preparation (Baytril®) in broilers was carried out. Oral pharmacokinetics of seventeen commercial enrofloxacin preparations and Baytril as reference preparation were assessed in five trials in a total of 1760 broilers. Ten mg/kg of each preparation was administered to a total of 80 clinically healthy 3 weeks old broilers. After drug administration, blood was collected 8 times from ten birds within 24h. Using a microbiological agar diffusion analysis, serum concentration of enrofloxacin and metabolites were determined by correlating the composite antibacterial activity of enrofloxacin and metabolites with actual concentration. Bioequivalence limits were set between 80 to 125% reference values for maximum serum concentration (Csmax) and area under the curve (AUC). Results display mean Baytril® values of Csmax=1.662μg/ml±0.034 ; AUC=4.073±0.814μg/ml/hr. Only three preparations out of seventeen could be regarded as bioequivalent while the rest gave AUC and/or Csmax values smaller than the accepted lower limit of the mean values obtained for the reference enrofloxacin (P<0.05). The use of non-bioequivalent preparations of enrofloxacin will consequently undermine clinical outcomes and could play a significant role in accelerating the emergence of bacterial resistance in the poultry industry.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Considering the importance of fluoroquinolones in animal health and the fact that the enrofloxacin patent has expired, a bioequivalence study of seventeen preparations of enrofloxacin vs. the reference preparation (Baytril®) in broilers was carried out. Oral pharmacokinetics of seventeen commercial enrofloxacin preparations and Baytril as reference preparation were assessed in five trials in a total of 1760 broilers. Ten mg/kg of each preparation was administered to a total of 80 clinically healthy 3 weeks old broilers. After drug administration, blood was collected 8 times from ten birds within 24h. Using a microbiological agar diffusion analysis, serum concentration of enrofloxacin and metabolites were determined by correlating the composite antibacterial activity of enrofloxacin and metabolites with actual concentration. Bioequivalence limits were set between 80 to 125% reference values for maximum serum concentration (Csmax) and area under the curve (AUC). Results display mean Baytril® values of Csmax=1.662μg/ml±0.034 ; AUC=4.073±0.814μg/ml/hr. Only three preparations out of seventeen could be regarded as bioequivalent while the rest gave AUC and/or Csmax values smaller than the accepted lower limit of the mean values obtained for the reference enrofloxacin (P<0.05). The use of non-bioequivalent preparations of enrofloxacin will consequently undermine clinical outcomes and could play a significant role in accelerating the emergence of bacterial resistance in the poultry industry.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Considering the importance of fluoroquinolones in animal health and the fact that the enrofloxacin patent has expired, a bioequivalence study of seventeen preparations of enrofloxacin vs. the reference preparation (Baytril®) in broilers was carried out. Oral pharmacokinetics of seventeen commercial enrofloxacin preparations and Baytril as reference preparation were assessed in five trials in a total of 1760 broilers. Ten mg/kg of each preparation was administered to a total of 80 clinically healthy 3 weeks old broilers. After drug administration, blood was collected 8 times from ten birds within 24h. Using a microbiological agar diffusion analysis, serum concentration of enrofloxacin and metabolites were determined by correlating the composite antibacterial activity of enrofloxacin and metabolites with actual concentration. Bioequivalence limits were set between 80 to 125% reference values for maximum serum concentration (Csmax) and area under the curve (AUC). Results display mean Baytril® values of Csmax=1.662μg/ml±0.034 ; AUC=4.073±0.814μg/ml/hr. Only three preparations out of seventeen could be regarded as bioequivalent while the rest gave AUC and/or Csmax values smaller than the accepted lower limit of the mean values obtained for the reference enrofloxacin (P<0.05). The use of non-bioequivalent preparations of enrofloxacin will consequently undermine clinical outcomes and could play a significant role in accelerating the emergence of bacterial resistance in the poultry industry.

Key concepts: Enrofloxacin, Bioequivalence, Pharmacokinetics, Medicine, Pharmacology, Area under the curve, Bioavailability, Animal science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioequivalence Comparison of Seventeen Commercial Oral Enrofloxacins against the Original Pioneer Preparation in Broilers — Research Paper | ScholarLens