1984Applied OpticsRequires access

Modulation-transfer-function analysis for sampled image systems

Stephen K. Park, Robert A. Schowengerdt, Mary-Anne Kaczynski

Open publisher page 195 citations

Abstract

Sampling generally causes the response of a digital imaging system to be locally shift-variant and not directly amenable to MTF analysis. However, this paper demonstrates that a meaningful system response can be calculated by averaging over an ensemble of point-source system inputs to yield an MTF which accounts for the combined effects of image formation, sampling, and image reconstruction. As an illustration, the MTF of the Landsat MSS system is analyzed to reveal an average effective IFOV which is significantly larger than the commonly accepted value, particularly in the along-track direction where undersampling contributes markedly to an MTF reduction and resultant increase in image blur.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sampling generally causes the response of a digital imaging system to be locally shift-variant and not directly amenable to MTF analysis. However, this paper demonstrates that a meaningful system response can be calculated by averaging over an ensemble of point-source system inputs to yield an MTF which accounts for the combined effects of image formation, sampling, and image reconstruction. As an illustration, the MTF of the Landsat MSS system is analyzed to reveal an average effective IFOV which is significantly larger than the commonly accepted value, particularly in the along-track direction where undersampling contributes markedly to an MTF reduction and resultant increase in image blur.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 195 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sampling generally causes the response of a digital imaging system to be locally shift-variant and not directly amenable to MTF analysis. However, this paper demonstrates that a meaningful system response can be calculated by averaging over an ensemble of point-source system inputs to yield an MTF which accounts for the combined effects of image formation, sampling, and image reconstruction. As an illustration, the MTF of the Landsat MSS system is analyzed to reveal an average effective IFOV which is significantly larger than the commonly accepted value, particularly in the along-track direction where undersampling contributes markedly to an MTF reduction and resultant increase in image blur.

Key concepts: Undersampling, Optical transfer function, Point spread function, Optics, Nyquist frequency, Image quality, Image restoration, Sampling (signal processing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modulation-transfer-function analysis for sampled image systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens