2014•Mediterranean Journal of Social SciencesOpen access

Is Critical Thinking Desirable for Children?

Amasa Philip Ndofirepi

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In this paper, I theorise the conception of critical thinking as a normative activity in which certain standards and criteria are applied to what people say or do and even write. I situate critical thinking in the context of children and inquire into its suitability and applicability in the world of young people. There is no consensus on the meaning of critical thinking, what its educational outcomes could be and the most effective means of achieving it especially when applied to children in schools. I illuminate and uphold a conception of critical thinking and the critical thinker basing on Matthew Lipman’s Philosophy for Children programme as one opportunity of initiating critical thinking from an early age. I advance the conception that developing critical thinking is the focal aim of educating children and “…the ultimate educational ideal” (Siegel, 1988, p. 137). DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n10p325

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, I theorise the conception of critical thinking as a normative activity in which certain standards and criteria are applied to what people say or do and even write. I situate critical thinking in the context of children and inquire into its suitability and applicability in the world of young people. There is no consensus on the meaning of critical thinking, what its educational outcomes could be and the most effective means of achieving it especially when applied to children in schools. I illuminate and uphold a conception of critical thinking and the critical thinker basing on Matthew Lipman’s Philosophy for Children programme as one opportunity of initiating critical thinking from an early age. I advance the conception that developing critical thinking is the focal aim of educating children and “…the ultimate educational ideal” (Siegel, 1988, p. 137). DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n10p325

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, I theorise the conception of critical thinking as a normative activity in which certain standards and criteria are applied to what people say or do and even write. I situate critical thinking in the context of children and inquire into its suitability and applicability in the world of young people. There is no consensus on the meaning of critical thinking, what its educational outcomes could be and the most effective means of achieving it especially when applied to children in schools. I illuminate and uphold a conception of critical thinking and the critical thinker basing on Matthew Lipman’s Philosophy for Children programme as one opportunity of initiating critical thinking from an early age. I advance the conception that developing critical thinking is the focal aim of educating children and “…the ultimate educational ideal” (Siegel, 1988, p. 137). DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n10p325

Key concepts: Critical thinking, Normative, Philosophy for Children, Parallel thinking, Ideal (ethics), Meaning (existential), Context (archaeology), Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is Critical Thinking Desirable for Children? — Research Paper | ScholarLens