1999•Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseRequires access

EFFECTS OF AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC TRAINING TO EXHAUSTION ON VO2MAX AND EXERCISE PERFORMANCE

A. J. Villani, Bo Fernhall, W. C. Miller

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

1093 This study compared how exhaustive aerobic continuous training (AT) and exhaustive anaerobic interval training (ANT) affected VO2max, exercise to fatigue at VO2max, and Wingate Power Test scores. Subjects were 15 men and women (24.1±0.5 y, BMI=24.1±1.0, VO2max=39.0±1.8 ml/kg/min; mean±SEM). AT started at 70% VO2max and increased by 5% of VO2max every 3 min until fatigue. The ANT consisted of 15 sec sprints at 170% VO2max, followed by a 30 sec recovery at <50% VO2max. If fatigue did not occur before 15 min of ANT, the recovery intervals were then shortened to 15 sec. Both groups exercised 3 d/wk for 4 wk. There was no group difference for exercise time per session (AT=16.1±0.4, ANT=17.2±0.5 min). After training, the ANT group increased time to fatigue at VO2max (5.23±0.41 to 7.47±0.91 min), while the AT showed no significant change (4.09±0.52 to 5.31±0.91 min). VO2max improved by 4.0±1.2 ml/kg/min in the ANT group, whereas the AT group saw no change (−1.3±0.9). Improvements in peak power (0.94±0.23 vs −0.19±0.10 watts/kg b.w.), power output over 30 sec (0.41±0.19 vs −0.11±0.09 watts/kg b.w.), and total work output (11.7±5.8 vs −3.5±2.8 J/kg) were greater for the ANT than the AT, respectively. Exhaustive ANT 3d/wk for < 20 min improves VO2max, exercise time to fatigue at VO2max, and Wingate Power Test performance more than exhaustive AT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1093 This study compared how exhaustive aerobic continuous training (AT) and exhaustive anaerobic interval training (ANT) affected VO2max, exercise to fatigue at VO2max, and Wingate Power Test scores. Subjects were 15 men and women (24.1±0.5 y, BMI=24.1±1.0, VO2max=39.0±1.8 ml/kg/min; mean±SEM). AT started at 70% VO2max and increased by 5% of VO2max every 3 min until fatigue. The ANT consisted of 15 sec sprints at 170% VO2max, followed by a 30 sec recovery at <50% VO2max. If fatigue did not occur before 15 min of ANT, the recovery intervals were then shortened to 15 sec. Both groups exercised 3 d/wk for 4 wk. There was no group difference for exercise time per session (AT=16.1±0.4, ANT=17.2±0.5 min). After training, the ANT group increased time to fatigue at VO2max (5.23±0.41 to 7.47±0.91 min), while the AT showed no significant change (4.09±0.52 to 5.31±0.91 min). VO2max improved by 4.0±1.2 ml/kg/min in the ANT group, whereas the AT group saw no change (−1.3±0.9). Improvements in peak power (0.94±0.23 vs −0.19±0.10 watts/kg b.w.), power output over 30 sec (0.41±0.19 vs −0.11±0.09 watts/kg b.w.), and total work output (11.7±5.8 vs −3.5±2.8 J/kg) were greater for the ANT than the AT, respectively. Exhaustive ANT 3d/wk for < 20 min improves VO2max, exercise time to fatigue at VO2max, and Wingate Power Test performance more than exhaustive AT.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1093 This study compared how exhaustive aerobic continuous training (AT) and exhaustive anaerobic interval training (ANT) affected VO2max, exercise to fatigue at VO2max, and Wingate Power Test scores. Subjects were 15 men and women (24.1±0.5 y, BMI=24.1±1.0, VO2max=39.0±1.8 ml/kg/min; mean±SEM). AT started at 70% VO2max and increased by 5% of VO2max every 3 min until fatigue. The ANT consisted of 15 sec sprints at 170% VO2max, followed by a 30 sec recovery at <50% VO2max. If fatigue did not occur before 15 min of ANT, the recovery intervals were then shortened to 15 sec. Both groups exercised 3 d/wk for 4 wk. There was no group difference for exercise time per session (AT=16.1±0.4, ANT=17.2±0.5 min). After training, the ANT group increased time to fatigue at VO2max (5.23±0.41 to 7.47±0.91 min), while the AT showed no significant change (4.09±0.52 to 5.31±0.91 min). VO2max improved by 4.0±1.2 ml/kg/min in the ANT group, whereas the AT group saw no change (−1.3±0.9). Improvements in peak power (0.94±0.23 vs −0.19±0.10 watts/kg b.w.), power output over 30 sec (0.41±0.19 vs −0.11±0.09 watts/kg b.w.), and total work output (11.7±5.8 vs −3.5±2.8 J/kg) were greater for the ANT than the AT, respectively. Exhaustive ANT 3d/wk for < 20 min improves VO2max, exercise time to fatigue at VO2max, and Wingate Power Test performance more than exhaustive AT.

Key concepts: Anaerobic exercise, Animal science, Interval training, Wingate test, Medicine, VO2 max, Running economy, Aerobic exercise

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EFFECTS OF AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC TRAINING TO EXHAUSTION ON VO2MAX AND EXERCISE PERFORMANCE — Research Paper | ScholarLens