2004The LaryngoscopeRequires access

Is A Plexiform Neurofibroma Pathognomonic of Neurofibromatosis Type I?

Vincent Lin, Sam J. Daniel, Vito Forte

Open publisher page 62 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Several prominent textbooks have claimed that a plexiform neurofibroma is pathognomonic for neurofibromatosis type I. This is not in agreement with the National Institutes of Health criteria, which require two signs to be present, one of which can be a plexiform neurofibroma. Is a plexiform neurofibroma pathognomonic for neurofibromatosis type I? STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with surgically resected plexiform neurofibromas between the years 1991 and 2001 were identified, and their charts reviewed. The presence and absence of any manifestation of neurofibromatosis type I as detailed in the National Institutes of Health criteria were recorded. The pathology database at the Hospital for Sick Children (HSC) was searched retrospectively. RESULTS: Five of the 51 patients had a single solitary plexiform neurofibroma. They were followed at the neurofibromatosis clinic at the HSC with regular detailed examinations and no other stigmata were found. CONCLUSION: Although plexiform neurofibromas are highly suggestive of neurofibromatosis type I, they are not pathognomonic as claimed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Several prominent textbooks have claimed that a plexiform neurofibroma is pathognomonic for neurofibromatosis type I. This is not in agreement with the National Institutes of Health criteria, which require two signs to be present, one of which can be a plexiform neurofibroma. Is a plexiform neurofibroma pathognomonic for neurofibromatosis type I? STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with surgically resected plexiform neurofibromas between the years 1991 and 2001 were identified, and their charts reviewed. The presence and absence of any manifestation of neurofibromatosis type I as detailed in the National Institutes of Health criteria were recorded. The pathology database at the Hospital for Sick Children (HSC) was searched retrospectively. RESULTS: Five of the 51 patients had a single solitary plexiform neurofibroma. They were followed at the neurofibromatosis clinic at the HSC with regular detailed examinations and no other stigmata were found. CONCLUSION: Although plexiform neurofibromas are highly suggestive of neurofibromatosis type I, they are not pathognomonic as claimed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 62 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Several prominent textbooks have claimed that a plexiform neurofibroma is pathognomonic for neurofibromatosis type I. This is not in agreement with the National Institutes of Health criteria, which require two signs to be present, one of which can be a plexiform neurofibroma. Is a plexiform neurofibroma pathognomonic for neurofibromatosis type I? STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with surgically resected plexiform neurofibromas between the years 1991 and 2001 were identified, and their charts reviewed. The presence and absence of any manifestation of neurofibromatosis type I as detailed in the National Institutes of Health criteria were recorded. The pathology database at the Hospital for Sick Children (HSC) was searched retrospectively. RESULTS: Five of the 51 patients had a single solitary plexiform neurofibroma. They were followed at the neurofibromatosis clinic at the HSC with regular detailed examinations and no other stigmata were found. CONCLUSION: Although plexiform neurofibromas are highly suggestive of neurofibromatosis type I, they are not pathognomonic as claimed.

Key concepts: Pathognomonic, Plexiform neurofibroma, Neurofibromatosis, Neurofibroma, Neurofibromatosis type I, Medicine, Pathology, Disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is A Plexiform Neurofibroma Pathognomonic of Neurofibromatosis Type I? — Research Paper | ScholarLens