Schwa and the phonotactics of RP English
Barry Heselwood
Abstract
Barry Heselwood
Abstract
Abstract In this paper it is argued that the phonotactics of RP English 1 should be seen in terms of the arrangement of consonants around a full vowel nucleus, and that schwa has a pivotal role in facilitating such arrangements but is not itself distinctive in the vowel system. 2 Two types of function are identified for schwa: anaptyctic (e.g.today, abbot), and positional (e.g.support, lotus). Because schwa‐syllables are bound and their vocalic content predictable, there is no justification for setting them up as phonotactic domains. In order that their consonantal content can be put into phonotactic relation with a full vowel, a unit of distribution called a ‘phonotactic group’ is proposed. 3
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract In this paper it is argued that the phonotactics of RP English 1 should be seen in terms of the arrangement of consonants around a full vowel nucleus, and that schwa has a pivotal role in facilitating such arrangements but is not itself distinctive in the vowel system. 2 Two types of function are identified for schwa: anaptyctic (e.g.today, abbot), and positional (e.g.support, lotus). Because schwa‐syllables are bound and their vocalic content predictable, there is no justification for setting them up as phonotactic domains. In order that their consonantal content can be put into phonotactic relation with a full vowel, a unit of distribution called a ‘phonotactic group’ is proposed. 3
Key concepts: Phonotactics, Schwa, Vowel, Linguistics, Computer science, Mathematics, Phonology, Philosophy