ScholarLens Back to search
1978•Unpublished venueRequires access

How to show something is not

Keith Harrow

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Most introductory courses in theoretical computer science (formal language theory or computability theory) start with a seemingly endless series of definitions, including what it means for a grammar or language to be regular, context-free, etc., or what it means for a function to be recursive, primitive recursive, or partial recursive. Bright students immediately ask two questions. First, what are examples of languages or functions that belong to one class but not the other? Second, is some particular language context-free, or is a particular function recursive?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Most introductory courses in theoretical computer science (formal language theory or computability theory) start with a seemingly endless series of definitions, including what it means for a grammar or language to be regular, context-free, etc., or what it means for a function to be recursive, primitive recursive, or partial recursive. Bright students immediately ask two questions. First, what are examples of languages or functions that belong to one class but not the other? Second, is some particular language context-free, or is a particular function recursive?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Most introductory courses in theoretical computer science (formal language theory or computability theory) start with a seemingly endless series of definitions, including what it means for a grammar or language to be regular, context-free, etc., or what it means for a function to be recursive, primitive recursive, or partial recursive. Bright students immediately ask two questions. First, what are examples of languages or functions that belong to one class but not the other? Second, is some particular language context-free, or is a particular function recursive?

Key concepts: Recursive functions, Primitive recursive function, Computability theory, Formal language, Computer science, Class (philosophy), Context (archaeology), Computability

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How to show something is not — Research Paper | ScholarLens