1995Archives of OphthalmologyRequires access

The Effects of Ablation Diameter on the Outcome of Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy

David O’Brart

Open publisher page 146 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of the ablation diameter on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. DESIGN: Eighty patients were randomized to either a 5.00-mm or a 6.00-mm treatment group and within these groups underwent either a -3.00-diopter (D) or a -6.00-D correction based on their preoperative refraction. A Summit Omnimed excimer laser was used throughout the study. RESULTS: In eyes treated with a 6.00-mm-diameter ablation, the initial hyperopic shift was reduced, with significant differences at 1 week with -3.00-D corrections and at 1 and 4 weeks with -6.00-D corrections (P < .01). At 6 months, the refractive changes were greater and closer to that intended with 6.00-mm-diameter ablations. The predictability of photorefractive keratectomy was significantly improved with 6.00-mm zones, with a reduction in variance of the refractive changes at all stages postoperatively (P < .05 to P < .001). With -3.00-D corrections, objective measurements showed significantly less anterior stromal haze in eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones at 6 months (P < .05). With -6.00-D corrections, haze was significantly reduced at 1, 3, and 6 months in the eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones (P < .05). Five eyes treated with 5.00-mm zones experienced severe regression of the correction, with marked corneal haze and a reduction of 3 or more lines of best corrected Snellen visual acuity at 6 months. No eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones were similarly affected. Computerized measurements of "night" halo were significantly lower in the 6.00-mm treatment groups at 1 week and at 1 and 6 months in the eyes with -3.00-D corrections and at 1 week and at 1 month in the eyes with -6.00-D corrections (P < .05). At 6 months, seven patients treated with 5.00-mm zones complained of severe disturbances of night vision. No eyes in the 6.00-mm group were similarly affected. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 6.00-mm ablation diameters precipitated less initial overcorrection, greatly improved the predictability of photorefractive keratectomy, and was associated with a reduction in complications impairing postoperative visual performance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of the ablation diameter on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. DESIGN: Eighty patients were randomized to either a 5.00-mm or a 6.00-mm treatment group and within these groups underwent either a -3.00-diopter (D) or a -6.00-D correction based on their preoperative refraction. A Summit Omnimed excimer laser was used throughout the study. RESULTS: In eyes treated with a 6.00-mm-diameter ablation, the initial hyperopic shift was reduced, with significant differences at 1 week with -3.00-D corrections and at 1 and 4 weeks with -6.00-D corrections (P < .01). At 6 months, the refractive changes were greater and closer to that intended with 6.00-mm-diameter ablations. The predictability of photorefractive keratectomy was significantly improved with 6.00-mm zones, with a reduction in variance of the refractive changes at all stages postoperatively (P < .05 to P < .001). With -3.00-D corrections, objective measurements showed significantly less anterior stromal haze in eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones at 6 months (P < .05). With -6.00-D corrections, haze was significantly reduced at 1, 3, and 6 months in the eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones (P < .05). Five eyes treated with 5.00-mm zones experienced severe regression of the correction, with marked corneal haze and a reduction of 3 or more lines of best corrected Snellen visual acuity at 6 months. No eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones were similarly affected. Computerized measurements of "night" halo were significantly lower in the 6.00-mm treatment groups at 1 week and at 1 and 6 months in the eyes with -3.00-D corrections and at 1 week and at 1 month in the eyes with -6.00-D corrections (P < .05). At 6 months, seven patients treated with 5.00-mm zones complained of severe disturbances of night vision. No eyes in the 6.00-mm group were similarly affected. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 6.00-mm ablation diameters precipitated less initial overcorrection, greatly improved the predictability of photorefractive keratectomy, and was associated with a reduction in complications impairing postoperative visual performance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 146 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of the ablation diameter on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. DESIGN: Eighty patients were randomized to either a 5.00-mm or a 6.00-mm treatment group and within these groups underwent either a -3.00-diopter (D) or a -6.00-D correction based on their preoperative refraction. A Summit Omnimed excimer laser was used throughout the study. RESULTS: In eyes treated with a 6.00-mm-diameter ablation, the initial hyperopic shift was reduced, with significant differences at 1 week with -3.00-D corrections and at 1 and 4 weeks with -6.00-D corrections (P < .01). At 6 months, the refractive changes were greater and closer to that intended with 6.00-mm-diameter ablations. The predictability of photorefractive keratectomy was significantly improved with 6.00-mm zones, with a reduction in variance of the refractive changes at all stages postoperatively (P < .05 to P < .001). With -3.00-D corrections, objective measurements showed significantly less anterior stromal haze in eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones at 6 months (P < .05). With -6.00-D corrections, haze was significantly reduced at 1, 3, and 6 months in the eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones (P < .05). Five eyes treated with 5.00-mm zones experienced severe regression of the correction, with marked corneal haze and a reduction of 3 or more lines of best corrected Snellen visual acuity at 6 months. No eyes treated with 6.00-mm zones were similarly affected. Computerized measurements of "night" halo were significantly lower in the 6.00-mm treatment groups at 1 week and at 1 and 6 months in the eyes with -3.00-D corrections and at 1 week and at 1 month in the eyes with -6.00-D corrections (P < .05). At 6 months, seven patients treated with 5.00-mm zones complained of severe disturbances of night vision. No eyes in the 6.00-mm group were similarly affected. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 6.00-mm ablation diameters precipitated less initial overcorrection, greatly improved the predictability of photorefractive keratectomy, and was associated with a reduction in complications impairing postoperative visual performance.

Key concepts: Photorefractive keratectomy, Ablation, Excimer, Excimer laser, Ophthalmology, Cornea, Medicine, Laser

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effects of Ablation Diameter on the Outcome of Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens