2005Journal of Algebra and Its ApplicationsRequires access

THE BAD BEHAVIOR OF REPRESENTATION GROUPS

Russell Higgs

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Let (H, A) be a primitive central extension of a finite group G. We show that A is not characteristic in H in general, and further demonstrate in a series of examples that results, which hold about inner automorphisms of H, do not extend to the full automorphism group of H. We also give some new results about isoclinism and representation groups of G in the case that H is capable. Finally we give an example of two non-isomorphic groups of the same order, which not only have a representation group in common, but also have identical projective character tables.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Let (H, A) be a primitive central extension of a finite group G. We show that A is not characteristic in H in general, and further demonstrate in a series of examples that results, which hold about inner automorphisms of H, do not extend to the full automorphism group of H. We also give some new results about isoclinism and representation groups of G in the case that H is capable. Finally we give an example of two non-isomorphic groups of the same order, which not only have a representation group in common, but also have identical projective character tables.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Let (H, A) be a primitive central extension of a finite group G. We show that A is not characteristic in H in general, and further demonstrate in a series of examples that results, which hold about inner automorphisms of H, do not extend to the full automorphism group of H. We also give some new results about isoclinism and representation groups of G in the case that H is capable. Finally we give an example of two non-isomorphic groups of the same order, which not only have a representation group in common, but also have identical projective character tables.

Key concepts: Mathematics, Automorphism, Group (periodic table), Character (mathematics), Extension (predicate logic), Representation (politics), Outer automorphism group, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE BAD BEHAVIOR OF REPRESENTATION GROUPS — Research Paper | ScholarLens