1998•The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Modeling spectral integration in binaural signal detection

Jeroen Breebaart, Steven van de Par, Armin Kohlrausch

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Estimates of critical bandwidths in binaural experiments vary considerably across experimental conditions. For masking experiments using signals of varying bandwidths (i.e., spectral integration), and experiments with a frequency-dependent interaural masker correlation, bandwidth estimates agree with those from monaural experiments. However, if auditory bandwidths are estimated from binaural band-widening masking experiments, the effective bandwidth is usually a factor of 2 to 3 times larger than monaural estimates. One often ignored detail is that this difference between monaural and binaural estimates decreases with decreasing masker level [Hall et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 894–898 (1983)]. Using the binaural model described by Breebaart et al., we have simulated the binaural experiments described above. It can be shown that, without any parameter change in the model, basically all relevant conditions can be modeled accurately, including the band-widening and spectral integration experiments. In agreement with the scheme discussed by Kohlrausch et al., detection in binaural narrow-band-noise conditions is improved by analyzing the internal representation in several adjacent filters. It is concluded that the absence of this detection advantage in monaural random-noise conditions is the primary cause for the so-called ‘‘wider binaural critical band.’’

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Estimates of critical bandwidths in binaural experiments vary considerably across experimental conditions. For masking experiments using signals of varying bandwidths (i.e., spectral integration), and experiments with a frequency-dependent interaural masker correlation, bandwidth estimates agree with those from monaural experiments. However, if auditory bandwidths are estimated from binaural band-widening masking experiments, the effective bandwidth is usually a factor of 2 to 3 times larger than monaural estimates. One often ignored detail is that this difference between monaural and binaural estimates decreases with decreasing masker level [Hall et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 894–898 (1983)]. Using the binaural model described by Breebaart et al., we have simulated the binaural experiments described above. It can be shown that, without any parameter change in the model, basically all relevant conditions can be modeled accurately, including the band-widening and spectral integration experiments. In agreement with the scheme discussed by Kohlrausch et al., detection in binaural narrow-band-noise conditions is improved by analyzing the internal representation in several adjacent filters. It is concluded that the absence of this detection advantage in monaural random-noise conditions is the primary cause for the so-called ‘‘wider binaural critical band.’’

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Estimates of critical bandwidths in binaural experiments vary considerably across experimental conditions. For masking experiments using signals of varying bandwidths (i.e., spectral integration), and experiments with a frequency-dependent interaural masker correlation, bandwidth estimates agree with those from monaural experiments. However, if auditory bandwidths are estimated from binaural band-widening masking experiments, the effective bandwidth is usually a factor of 2 to 3 times larger than monaural estimates. One often ignored detail is that this difference between monaural and binaural estimates decreases with decreasing masker level [Hall et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 894–898 (1983)]. Using the binaural model described by Breebaart et al., we have simulated the binaural experiments described above. It can be shown that, without any parameter change in the model, basically all relevant conditions can be modeled accurately, including the band-widening and spectral integration experiments. In agreement with the scheme discussed by Kohlrausch et al., detection in binaural narrow-band-noise conditions is improved by analyzing the internal representation in several adjacent filters. It is concluded that the absence of this detection advantage in monaural random-noise conditions is the primary cause for the so-called ‘‘wider binaural critical band.’’

Key concepts: Binaural recording, Monaural, Bandwidth (computing), Critical band, Acoustics, Noise (video), Masking (illustration), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modeling spectral integration in binaural signal detection — Research Paper | ScholarLens