1997The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Prognostics: What does it mean in condition-based maintenance?

G. William Nickerson

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The machinery condition monitoring community continues its search for the ‘‘Holy Grail’’ of prognostics. The problem is that there is no common agreement on two questions: ‘‘What does the term prognostics mean in this context’’? and ‘‘What must be done to achieve it’’? This paper differentiates ‘‘predictive maintenance’’ (in its generally accepted form) from ‘‘condition-based maintenance’’ (which requires prognostics). A justification for development and implementation of the more advanced and cost-effective condition-based maintenance is presented. A working definition of prognostics for the condition-based maintenance community is proposed. Further, a methodology for setting acceptable false alarm rates for both diagnostics and prognostics is presented to frame the problem for the research community in terms of the application environment, particularly for mission critical equipment. [See NOISE-CON Proceedings for full paper.]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The machinery condition monitoring community continues its search for the ‘‘Holy Grail’’ of prognostics. The problem is that there is no common agreement on two questions: ‘‘What does the term prognostics mean in this context’’? and ‘‘What must be done to achieve it’’? This paper differentiates ‘‘predictive maintenance’’ (in its generally accepted form) from ‘‘condition-based maintenance’’ (which requires prognostics). A justification for development and implementation of the more advanced and cost-effective condition-based maintenance is presented. A working definition of prognostics for the condition-based maintenance community is proposed. Further, a methodology for setting acceptable false alarm rates for both diagnostics and prognostics is presented to frame the problem for the research community in terms of the application environment, particularly for mission critical equipment. [See NOISE-CON Proceedings for full paper.]

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The machinery condition monitoring community continues its search for the ‘‘Holy Grail’’ of prognostics. The problem is that there is no common agreement on two questions: ‘‘What does the term prognostics mean in this context’’? and ‘‘What must be done to achieve it’’? This paper differentiates ‘‘predictive maintenance’’ (in its generally accepted form) from ‘‘condition-based maintenance’’ (which requires prognostics). A justification for development and implementation of the more advanced and cost-effective condition-based maintenance is presented. A working definition of prognostics for the condition-based maintenance community is proposed. Further, a methodology for setting acceptable false alarm rates for both diagnostics and prognostics is presented to frame the problem for the research community in terms of the application environment, particularly for mission critical equipment. [See NOISE-CON Proceedings for full paper.]

Key concepts: Prognostics, Condition-based maintenance, Context (archaeology), Reliability engineering, Computer science, Predictive maintenance, Condition monitoring, Preventive maintenance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prognostics: What does it mean in condition-based maintenance? — Research Paper | ScholarLens