2007British Journal of NeurosurgeryRequires access

Cauda equina syndrome – What is the correlation between clinical assessment and MRI scanning?

David Bell, Donald A. Collie, Patrick F. X. Statham

Open publisher page 119 citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The indications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in suspected cauda equina syndrome, and the urgency for this investigation are regularly disputed. In this study we assess the ability of neurosurgical residents to predict on clinical grounds in which patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) this was due to prolapsed intervertebral disc thereby justifying a request for urgent MR imaging. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of all adult patients with a suspected diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome. SETTING: A single tertiary referral neurosurgical centre. PARTICIPANTS: All patients referred over a four month period with a suspected diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome. RESULTS: MRI was normal in 10 (43%) patients. A disc prolapse causing cauda equina distortion was present in 5 (22%) patients. The diagnostic accuracy of urinary retention, urinary frequency, urinary incontinence, altered urinary sensation and altered perineal sensation were 0.57, 0.65, 0.61 ,0.65 and 0.60 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Because it is impossible in a significant proportion of patients to exclude the diagnosis of prolapsed intervertebral disc in the context of referral with suspected cauda equina compromise the authors recommend urgent MRI assessment in all patients who present with new onset urinary symptoms in the context of lumbar back pain or sciatica.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

UNLABELLED: The indications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in suspected cauda equina syndrome, and the urgency for this investigation are regularly disputed. In this study we assess the ability of neurosurgical residents to predict on clinical grounds in which patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) this was due to prolapsed intervertebral disc thereby justifying a request for urgent MR imaging. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of all adult patients with a suspected diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome. SETTING: A single tertiary referral neurosurgical centre. PARTICIPANTS: All patients referred over a four month period with a suspected diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome. RESULTS: MRI was normal in 10 (43%) patients. A disc prolapse causing cauda equina distortion was present in 5 (22%) patients. The diagnostic accuracy of urinary retention, urinary frequency, urinary incontinence, altered urinary sensation and altered perineal sensation were 0.57, 0.65, 0.61 ,0.65 and 0.60 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Because it is impossible in a significant proportion of patients to exclude the diagnosis of prolapsed intervertebral disc in the context of referral with suspected cauda equina compromise the authors recommend urgent MRI assessment in all patients who present with new onset urinary symptoms in the context of lumbar back pain or sciatica.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 119 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

UNLABELLED: The indications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in suspected cauda equina syndrome, and the urgency for this investigation are regularly disputed. In this study we assess the ability of neurosurgical residents to predict on clinical grounds in which patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) this was due to prolapsed intervertebral disc thereby justifying a request for urgent MR imaging. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of all adult patients with a suspected diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome. SETTING: A single tertiary referral neurosurgical centre. PARTICIPANTS: All patients referred over a four month period with a suspected diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome. RESULTS: MRI was normal in 10 (43%) patients. A disc prolapse causing cauda equina distortion was present in 5 (22%) patients. The diagnostic accuracy of urinary retention, urinary frequency, urinary incontinence, altered urinary sensation and altered perineal sensation were 0.57, 0.65, 0.61 ,0.65 and 0.60 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Because it is impossible in a significant proportion of patients to exclude the diagnosis of prolapsed intervertebral disc in the context of referral with suspected cauda equina compromise the authors recommend urgent MRI assessment in all patients who present with new onset urinary symptoms in the context of lumbar back pain or sciatica.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cauda equina syndrome, Cauda equina, Magnetic resonance imaging, Radiology, Intervertebral disc, Disc protrusion, Spinal cord

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cauda equina syndrome – What is the correlation between clinical assessment and MRI scanning? — Research Paper | ScholarLens