1983•International Studies QuarterlyRequires access

The Evaluation of Weighted Voting Schemes for the United Nations General Assembly

William J. Dixon

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Weighted voting has been suggested as one possible solution to the problem of representation in the UN General Assembly. Previous studies of alternative weighting formulas have failed to acknowledge that the distribution of actual voting power and the distribution of votes are seldom proportional under conditions of weighted voting. This research operationalizes the concept of voting power and applies it to the bloc distribution of General Assembly votes under 14 voting formulas which deviate from the current one state-one vote procedure. Weighted voting is shown to be a highly problematic method for adjusting the representational structure of a voting body such as the UN General Assembly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Weighted voting has been suggested as one possible solution to the problem of representation in the UN General Assembly. Previous studies of alternative weighting formulas have failed to acknowledge that the distribution of actual voting power and the distribution of votes are seldom proportional under conditions of weighted voting. This research operationalizes the concept of voting power and applies it to the bloc distribution of General Assembly votes under 14 voting formulas which deviate from the current one state-one vote procedure. Weighted voting is shown to be a highly problematic method for adjusting the representational structure of a voting body such as the UN General Assembly.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Weighted voting has been suggested as one possible solution to the problem of representation in the UN General Assembly. Previous studies of alternative weighting formulas have failed to acknowledge that the distribution of actual voting power and the distribution of votes are seldom proportional under conditions of weighted voting. This research operationalizes the concept of voting power and applies it to the bloc distribution of General Assembly votes under 14 voting formulas which deviate from the current one state-one vote procedure. Weighted voting is shown to be a highly problematic method for adjusting the representational structure of a voting body such as the UN General Assembly.

Key concepts: General assembly, Voting, Political science, Library science, Computer science, Regional science, Operations research, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Evaluation of Weighted Voting Schemes for the United Nations General Assembly — Research Paper | ScholarLens