Richmond line alliance: developing and delivering a complete rail system
Peter Boulden, Martha J. Smith
Abstract
Open-access reader
Peter Boulden, Martha J. Smith
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper presents a case study of the Richmond Line Alliance in the development and delivery of a major project underpinning urban passenger rail growth in the Sydney metropolitan area.This paper demonstrates how rail engineers and designers can benefit from a holistic rail system's approach to project delivery through the practical application of an integrated project assurance philosophy executed from a technical, safety and quality perspective.Advancing the topics of risk management and safety in transit systems, the paper uses the Richmond Line Duplication Stage 1 to present the results of outstanding industry practice and continuous improvement to conclude that:-An incentivised commercial and delivery framework motivates execution; -Application of interdisciplinary coordination processes expose conflicts and resolve issues of compatibility and consistency across design interfaces; -Design validation and product assurance processes challenge the design team to consider the product from a wider perspective and ensure it is robust when tested by end user scenarios; -A structured approach to design for constructability, operability, maintainability and safety can design out risk so far as reasonably practicable; and -Project safety culture is enhanced by tools to personalise the safety message.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper presents a case study of the Richmond Line Alliance in the development and delivery of a major project underpinning urban passenger rail growth in the Sydney metropolitan area.This paper demonstrates how rail engineers and designers can benefit from a holistic rail system's approach to project delivery through the practical application of an integrated project assurance philosophy executed from a technical, safety and quality perspective.Advancing the topics of risk management and safety in transit systems, the paper uses the Richmond Line Duplication Stage 1 to present the results of outstanding industry practice and continuous improvement to conclude that:-An incentivised commercial and delivery framework motivates execution; -Application of interdisciplinary coordination processes expose conflicts and resolve issues of compatibility and consistency across design interfaces; -Design validation and product assurance processes challenge the design team to consider the product from a wider perspective and ensure it is robust when tested by end user scenarios; -A structured approach to design for constructability, operability, maintainability and safety can design out risk so far as reasonably practicable; and -Project safety culture is enhanced by tools to personalise the safety message.
Key concepts: Maintainability, Operability, Safety assurance, Underpinning, Engineering, Risk analysis (engineering), Systems engineering, Process management