1985Scandinavian Journal of PsychologyRequires access

Effects of CS concentration in taste‐aversion learning: Problems in assessing aversion strength

Trevor Archer, Per‐Olow Sjödén

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The concentration of saccharin (CS) solutions was varied between groups of rats in four taste‐aversion learning experiments, using lithium chloride as the aversive agent (US). Saccharin intake was measured on four one‐bottle presentations yielding data on initial taste neophobia as well as postconditioning aversion strength. The results indicated that saccharin intake declined progressively with increasing concentrations on the first presentation, and that preconditioning intake to a large extent predicted postconditioning intake. In an attempt to correct postconditioning values for differences of saccharin intake on the preceding trial, a taste suppression ratio (TSR) was computed as the quotient of the amounts of saccharin consumed by individual rats on consecutive presentations. In general, the TSR was found to be too insensitive to detect differences of conditioning strength acquired by different saccharin concentrations. Alternative approaches to the CS‐concen‐tration problem in taste‐aversion learning are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The concentration of saccharin (CS) solutions was varied between groups of rats in four taste‐aversion learning experiments, using lithium chloride as the aversive agent (US). Saccharin intake was measured on four one‐bottle presentations yielding data on initial taste neophobia as well as postconditioning aversion strength. The results indicated that saccharin intake declined progressively with increasing concentrations on the first presentation, and that preconditioning intake to a large extent predicted postconditioning intake. In an attempt to correct postconditioning values for differences of saccharin intake on the preceding trial, a taste suppression ratio (TSR) was computed as the quotient of the amounts of saccharin consumed by individual rats on consecutive presentations. In general, the TSR was found to be too insensitive to detect differences of conditioning strength acquired by different saccharin concentrations. Alternative approaches to the CS‐concen‐tration problem in taste‐aversion learning are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The concentration of saccharin (CS) solutions was varied between groups of rats in four taste‐aversion learning experiments, using lithium chloride as the aversive agent (US). Saccharin intake was measured on four one‐bottle presentations yielding data on initial taste neophobia as well as postconditioning aversion strength. The results indicated that saccharin intake declined progressively with increasing concentrations on the first presentation, and that preconditioning intake to a large extent predicted postconditioning intake. In an attempt to correct postconditioning values for differences of saccharin intake on the preceding trial, a taste suppression ratio (TSR) was computed as the quotient of the amounts of saccharin consumed by individual rats on consecutive presentations. In general, the TSR was found to be too insensitive to detect differences of conditioning strength acquired by different saccharin concentrations. Alternative approaches to the CS‐concen‐tration problem in taste‐aversion learning are discussed.

Key concepts: Saccharin, Neophobia, Taste aversion, Taste, Psychology, Chemistry, Food science, Developmental psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of CS concentration in taste‐aversion learning: Problems in assessing aversion strength — Research Paper | ScholarLens