1987Arms control todayRequires access

Rocky START: optimism and obstacles on the road to reductions

Michèle A. Flournoy

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

For the past several months, reports of progress toward a US-Soviet agreement to eliminate intermediate-range nuclear forces (INF) have all but eclipsed discussion of negotiations in other arms control arenas. Recently, however, US and Soviet officials have expressed renewed optimism that an accord to reduce strategic offensive arms may follow closely on the heels of an INF treaty. Given the limited progress that has been made in the Strategic Arms Reductions Talks (START) since the 1986 Reykjavik summit, this optimism is surprising. No doubt the momentum and general popularity of the INF negotiations have whetted the appetites of leaders on both sides hungry for a place in history as men of peace. Both Shultz and Shevardnadze characterized the imminent INF treaty as a beginning, a first step toward a more significant nuclear arms control agreement. More telling, perhaps, is a growing hope among some US officials that the Soviet Union may break the stalemate by changing its approach to START in time for the Reagan administration to shepherd a second arms control treaty through the Senate-ratification process.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For the past several months, reports of progress toward a US-Soviet agreement to eliminate intermediate-range nuclear forces (INF) have all but eclipsed discussion of negotiations in other arms control arenas. Recently, however, US and Soviet officials have expressed renewed optimism that an accord to reduce strategic offensive arms may follow closely on the heels of an INF treaty. Given the limited progress that has been made in the Strategic Arms Reductions Talks (START) since the 1986 Reykjavik summit, this optimism is surprising. No doubt the momentum and general popularity of the INF negotiations have whetted the appetites of leaders on both sides hungry for a place in history as men of peace. Both Shultz and Shevardnadze characterized the imminent INF treaty as a beginning, a first step toward a more significant nuclear arms control agreement. More telling, perhaps, is a growing hope among some US officials that the Soviet Union may break the stalemate by changing its approach to START in time for the Reagan administration to shepherd a second arms control treaty through the Senate-ratification process.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For the past several months, reports of progress toward a US-Soviet agreement to eliminate intermediate-range nuclear forces (INF) have all but eclipsed discussion of negotiations in other arms control arenas. Recently, however, US and Soviet officials have expressed renewed optimism that an accord to reduce strategic offensive arms may follow closely on the heels of an INF treaty. Given the limited progress that has been made in the Strategic Arms Reductions Talks (START) since the 1986 Reykjavik summit, this optimism is surprising. No doubt the momentum and general popularity of the INF negotiations have whetted the appetites of leaders on both sides hungry for a place in history as men of peace. Both Shultz and Shevardnadze characterized the imminent INF treaty as a beginning, a first step toward a more significant nuclear arms control agreement. More telling, perhaps, is a growing hope among some US officials that the Soviet Union may break the stalemate by changing its approach to START in time for the Reagan administration to shepherd a second arms control treaty through the Senate-ratification process.

Key concepts: Arms control, Treaty, Stalemate, Political science, Optimism, Summit, Negotiation, Ratification

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rocky START: optimism and obstacles on the road to reductions — Research Paper | ScholarLens